User talk:Raphaelhorowitz

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dong-Min Lim. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 65 HC A7 22:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alexis Golovin, you may be blocked from editing. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 22:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alexis Golovin. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 23:06, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Tout d abord je souhaitais m excuser pour avoir essayé de comprendre le fonctionnement de l encyclopédie. je souhaiterais bien sûr rester dans l ombre et m occuper des pages des musiciens classiques sans exposer mon car j' ai compris votre fonctionnement pouvez vous débloquer mon compte afin que je puisse contribuer sans refaire les mêmes erreurs Cordialement Raphaël Rivoal Raphaelhorowitz (talk) 01:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of the above: "First of all I want to excuse myself for trying to understand how the encyclopedia works. I would of course stay in the shadows and take care of the pages of classical musicians without publicising myself because I understand your operation. Can you unlock my account so that I can contribute without making the same mistakes." I strongly advise not unblocking this person. He vandalised 11 articles on classical pianists by substituting his own name for that of the subject and used false edit summaries. He continued in spite of multiple warnings. This is not a question of "trying to understand how Wikipedia works". Note this person has also vandalised 13 articles on the French Wikipedia between yesterday and today, again with false edit summaries [1]. Voceditenore (talk) 13:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]