User talk:Raul Babi9922

December 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Dukes of Braganza, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 23:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I am new to Wikipedia, I am just getting used of how it works. Unfortunately, I can't see the Visual Editor while editing pages and this makes me a little bit confused regarding the adding of sources and references! If you can indicate me how to do this, I'd be deeply grateful! Thank you, LilianaUwU! Raul Babi9922 (talk) 23:29, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Raul Babi9922! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I am new to editing on Wikipedia so I am just getting used to the mechanism of it. I will address the problem on the talk page, but I have seen that YOU have reverted the article 2 times to the version YOU prepare, while I am just trying to add some useful pieces of information about the successor of Maria Pia. Thank you for the message! Best wishes,

RAUL Raul Babi9922 (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Agricola (June 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

remove Facebook links and write ONLY what can be sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christian Agricola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:46, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Raul Babi9922! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:46, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]