User talk:Regurgitator

Speedy deletion of Sandusky regurgitator

A tag has been placed on Sandusky regurgitator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironho lds 00:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Just a warning, you've already reverted the article 4 times in the span of about 2 hours. You may not be aware of the three-revert-rule policy, so I won't block you at this point for violating it. However, you may consider this fair warning; if you revert the page again, you will be blocked for violating 3RR. Please present your reasons for including the website on the article's talk page instead of edit-warring. Parsecboy (talk) 22:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:49, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

This account has been blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry and spamming. See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Regurgitator for the evidence. If the user agrees to comply with policies, they might be unblocked. Jehochman ^Talk 08:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]