User talk:Rekatj2

This account is a sockpuppet of Verdict (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Hello Rekatj2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Wikidudeman ^(talk) 23:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Weight training

The reason there's pictures of the woman is because she's doing weight training exercises. She was kind enough to pose for pictures demonstrating the movements, then upload them under the GFDL license. Unless you've got alternative pictures, they're appropriate the page and should stay up. WLU 00:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(from my talk page) so your saying i could take pictures of me in the gym of those routines and then upload them under gdfl and put them on the article?--Rekatj2 02:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 02:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Echoing Wikidudeman, yes. However, the pictures are still subject to common sense - if your pictures are better, they'll stay. If the pre-existing picture is better, it goes back. Best is if you upload to Wikimedia Commons so it can be used by all the wikipedias. See WP:IMAGE for more info. Where do you think all the images come from? :) WLU 02:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well i dont feel like going throug the process when there is a chance they get removed.--Rekatj2 13:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you like. You'll have to read WP:IMAGE for more guidance on this topic. WLU 13:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protected page

I'm not an admin, you're going to have to do some digging to find one and ask them, or wait until the page is unprotected. From what I understand, each page protection has an expiry date so it should come up some time in the future. If you go over to the administrator's notice board, you should be able to find an admin fairly easily by looking through the talk pages. WLU 13:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and try this template: {{editprotect}}. It might take a while, but it's the formal way of doing something. If, after you've posted something, and a few days go by, you can probably say something at WP:AN. Hope this helps. The Evil Spartan 16:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Rekatj2 16:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rekatj2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i dont know my reason but wish to keep editing

Decline reason:

Sorry, see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Verdict and m:checkuser. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.