User talk:Rianahen
This user is a student editor in UCLA/Psychology_220A_(Fall) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Rianahen, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Moral blindness at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:59, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- I've looked at this and posed some tough questions. Please take another look at the nomination. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Moral blindness
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Moral blindness you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Moral blindness
[edit]The article Moral blindness you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Moral blindness for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Moral blindness
[edit]The article Moral blindness you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Moral blindness for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Good Article Reassessment
[edit]Moral blindness has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. MartinPoulter (talk) 20:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)