- 1 Talk sub pages
- 2 Jersey Politics
- 3 Talk Here
- 4 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Centre party logo.jpg
- 5 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jdalogo.JPG
- 6 Nomination of Steve Pallett for deletion
- 7 Hello
- 8 Jersey elections
- 9 Bob Hill (Jersey politician)
- 10 New Page Patrol survey
- 11 Category:Beeches Old Boys
- 12 WikiProject
- 13 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 14 Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
- 15 New deal for page patrollers
- 16 Women in Red World Contest
Talk sub pages
- 1. Complete List_of_politicians_in_Jersey for other ten parishes.
- 2. Expand section on parochial activity
- 3. Complete entries for all current Jersey Ministers and other major political figures
- 4. Complete election information for List of elections in Jersey
I don't believe that factual lists are copyrightable, and given that the election results are by their very nature information in the public domain, I'd say you would be safe in reproducing the results from that source. Man vyi 17:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Your cat:ting has been overall helpful, thank you. But could you look at the conventions in supercat:s before proposing changes, please. Then, if you want to propose a change away from convention, at least argue away for it on the basis of what exists! Happy cat:ting! Man vyi 07:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Cats - VCs
I like the look of the new People from Jersey categories. You may like to consider how best to integrate the List of Channel Islands Victoria Cross recipients into Category:Victoria Cross recipients from Jersey. footie 17:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
All recipients have now been moved to the new category. RichardColgate 16:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes, that looks fair and accurate to me. Nice one.Daverotherham 20:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Jersey Democratic Alliance
Well done again. Your latest changes make the article far more useful to a lay reader wishing to find out about the party, which should be our prime objective as Wikipedians.Daverotherham 03:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Centre party logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Centre party logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jdalogo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Jdalogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of Steve Pallett for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Pallett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TeapotgeorgeTalk 16:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
I have reverted your request for deletion of Jersey Conservative Party as other users have made contributions it cannot be deleted per criterion G7 (See the section on Non-criteria. If you still think the article should be deleted, please take it to Articles for deletion. Feinoha Talk, My master 02:51, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
I'll keep an eye on the page and contribute where possible. I'll also aim to get some illustrative media during the campaigns (this time not subject to deletion, like the last lot...) Man vyi (talk) 08:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Bob Hill (Jersey politician)
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation
Hello RichardColgate! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part.
Category:Beeches Old Boys
Category:Beeches Old Boys, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:16, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
New deal for page patrollers
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!