User talk:Richard LVP Real

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Richard LVP Real! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dreamy ^\*/_!$! 21:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

November 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 20:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Angelo (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Stanley Park Stadium, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Philip Trueman (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Steven Gerrard. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.--Ged UK (talk) 09:12, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Stanley Park Stadium. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Ged UK (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Point of View[edit]

Hi, having reviewed your recent edits, since coming across your comments on the Stanley Park Stadium talk page, I'm concerned that you do not understand the neutral point of view policy. I would suggest that you read the policy pages on the subject; Links are currently shown to this on the welcome note at the top of this talk page. While your obvious passion for football and your club is admirable, your edits and comments on talk pages indicate bias and suggest that you are either not aware of the policies on Wikipedia, or that you are and cannot control your passion for the subject when the views of others do not agree. Comments such as that on GedUK's talk page indicating that you will evade blocks by creating a new username is known as Sock Puppetry which is taken very seriously. I appreciate that Ged's tone in leaving you the warning was abrupt, but that was likely due to seeing previous warnings for WP:NPOV violations on your talk page, and a good example of an occasion on which taking a deep breath and calming down before responding is the wisest course. If after calming down you still feel like making such statements, and if you are serious in such threats (I hope you are not!) then you will likely continue to come into conflict with other editors, and the tone of your comments and repeated disregard for warnings is likely to be poorly received when Admins get involved. While you seem to have had a break from editing lately, your edit in August to David Beckham and the reply to your talk page comment show that you are continuing to edit in the same manner. This is not intended to be a 'telling off', I am simply trying to offer advice to avoid the risk of your being banned. All contributions are valuable, but it is important that we are all working towards the same goal. I hope you take this in the tone it is intended and continue to contribute towards the project. Bertcocaine (talk) 01:14, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]