User talk:Richardtrifan

Welcome!

Hello, Richardtrifan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Richard Trifan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:17, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Trifan

A tag has been placed on Richard Trifan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:17, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:17, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may also want to look over the notability criteria for people provided at WP:BIO. - Vianello (Talk) 21:22, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To: Vianello regarding page Richard Trifan

Dear Vianello, May I receive a copy of my deleted page, Richard Trifan? You deleted it today due to A7, and I would like to use the article Wizard to better prove the case for significant, important contributions of this person. My e-mail is richardtrifan@hotmail.com and you could also put a copy of the deleted page in my workspace. Thank you very much! Richard Trifan

Absolutely. It'll be at User:Richardtrifan/Draft in just a few moments. - Vianello (Talk) 22:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richard, many problems

The court case may be notable, that doesn't make you notable, especially as a musician. Roe v Wade was notable, but Roe wasn't even known at the time
It is now wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have references to independent verifiable sources Virtually nothing about you has such verification other than the VP bit
Lack of proper references for what is being claimed means that we cannot establish that you meet the notability guidelines. if you have done all that you claim, verify it with independent sources. Even so it's a bit marginal. You've written an opera, but no list of where and when it has been performed. If you are so notable as a musician, why aren't you doing it full time.
Acknowledgement to Parents and Family non-encyclopaedic and creepy. If you want this to be a personal page, put it on your website or blog. This is an encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. This section is a perfect example of why autobiographies are discouraged
Autobiographies also tend to contain spam and puffery like Later works would re-emphasize the beauty of the melody and diatonic harmonic structure while remaining unique and un-eclectic, a challenging growth step in a composer's life work.

Hope this helps, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:50, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richard, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. Jordan Rudess is OK in terms of presentation. It could do with more referencing, one of the refs doesn't work, and some refs are formatted poorly, but it establishes notability and doesn't contain much is the way of great talent etc type spam. If you want to see a really good musician article, try Elvis Presley, John Lennon or Frank Zappa. I'm not suggesting you try to emulate these featured articles, but they just show what can be done. If you like, you can write a draft here, let me know when you are done, and I'll have a look. I should say again, though, that autobiography is not a good idea. It's hard to be objective, and whilst you may know your history and motivations, they still need references to proper sources so others can check. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:28, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Talk (Music Machine song)

I took your addition out of Talk Talk (song), because that article's specifically about the song by Talk Talk (band). But if you have a few more good references on the earlier song, that'd make a good separate article - David Gerard (talk) 20:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]