User talk:Rob205162

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Rob205162, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 03:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Mrzinn138 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rob205162 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account activities, while limited to editing a page belonging to Eric LeCompte, are not in any way affiliated with another account on Wikipedia. I assume that this confusion may have occurred because i use a public internet connection while at work, where during my free time i try to keep up to date on various things on wikipedia. I do intend to make edits in the future on a range of topics, it is simply the case that since my recent account creation i have found trying to improve Mr. LeCompte's page to be the most important. So far i do not believe that any of my edits have been harmful, and it is in no way my intention to publish false information. It truly saddens me that because i have focused so much effort on editing one page i will no longer have the opportunity to help other pages, on which i have heavily relied over the years.

Decline reason:

I think you're being disingenuous at best; what is your relationship to User:Lovealwayswins12, who was editing the LeCompte page from the same IP as you, at the same time? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rob205162 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just to clarify, the IP address belongs to my employer and isn't "public" in the strictest sense, but it is accessible to multiple people. User:Lovealwayswins12 is a colleague who pointed out the merge proposal on this page, and asked if i was interested in looking at it, and potentially weighing in. I can understand how it would seem disingenuous, and looking back the timing was unfortunate, however my edits remain my own. If there is anything else i can answer for your or clarify, i'd be happy to.

Decline reason:

I'm declining the unblock request for the same reason as I did here. If you are indeed two separate individuals you are technically and behaviourally indistinguishable. You admit to being canvassed to participate in the discussion and you have no edits outside of the topic. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.