Jump to content

User talk:Robyn Brunton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Robyn Brunton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Pregnancy-related anxiety, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Eyesnore 13:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for the feedback and apologies if the content seemed like a conflict of interest. We will be adding additional content that is sourced from other key researchers in this area but to get started we used predominantly our citations (we are key researchers in this area). Is it Ok if we add more content to the page or will the page be removed? Robyn Brunton (talk) 19:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pregnancy-related anxiety. Thanks! Eyesnore 13:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robyn Brunton, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Robyn Brunton! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mikehawk10 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Because this article covers biomedical information, a higher standard is required for a source to be considered reliable. The reliable sources guideline for biomedical topics states that primary medical sources (such as laboratory observational studies or RCTs) should be avoided in favor of secondary and tertiary sources. If you have other review articles published in reputable journals, or if there is a textbook that you have that describes this condition, then that may help establish notability. However, for now, I don't see notability demonstrated through the article's sources, only one of which appears to be secondary. Additionally, this article contains blank sections. Something needs to happen to those (whether it be that they are filled with reliably sourced information or deleted) before this gets moved to the mainspace.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Robyn Brunton! Your additions to Draft:Pregnancy-related anxiety have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 23:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
this is an essay, not an encyclopedic article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 10:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Psychology

[edit]

Hi, I noticed you have shown an interest in articles related to psychology.

WikiProject Psychology is a group of experts, students and enthusiasts improving Wikipedia articles with any connection to psychology. We have a noticeboard where you can ask for help, or where your input will be very welcome. To stay in touch, add the WikiProject page to your watchlist (here's how to do this). You might also find these links helpful:

If you make big improvements to a psychology-related article, or small improvements to many, you will earn our lasting gratitude, or even a Barnstar. I hope you enjoy your time on Wikipedia. 

--Xurizuri (talk) 02:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lazy Maniik was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Best Regards.---✨LazyManiik✨ 13:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Information icon Hello, Robyn Brunton. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pregnancy-related anxiety, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
Relies too heavily on the creators research (see WP:SELFCITE) and the conflict of interest has yet be appropriately handled. What I suggest is starting a discussion on the Pregnancy talk page as there are many well-informed active editors there. This topic, if deemed valid, should be covered in that article first. Be transparent about your COI.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 17:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I also noticed your response to the Welcome message above and using the term "we". Just to be clear, an account should only represent one individual and sharing an account is a violation of policy. If this account has been/is being shared, please change the password asap to one only you know. Other people need to register their own accounts but all will need to declare their conflict of interest| in regards to this topic and any other relevant topics. In addition to the above about WP:SELFCITE, you may also find WP:EXPERT helpful. If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 20:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robyn_Brunton&oldid=1122096410"