User talk:Rochellemoulton

Your submission at Articles for creation: Financial life planning (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cutest Penguin was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Financial life planning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:50, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rochellemoulton, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:50, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Financial life planning has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Financial life planning. Thanks! — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:52, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Financial life planning concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Financial life planning, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Financial life planning

Hello, Rochellemoulton. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Financial life planning".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Financial life planning}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COI

This is the first I've heard of a conflict of interest. My intent was to get a draft up that others could comment upon. I do have a client who is a financial life planner--but have written this article without any intent to promote. Does that disqualify me from working further on this article?Rochellemoulton (talk) 21:29, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this from the draft space area. The problem about you posting there is that at this point in time the article doesn't exist and it's also not really guaranteed to actually be seen. I actually came across this somewhat randomly since I was looking over the article to see if there were any big issues. Offhand I do see that the article has some promotional issues including the usage of a block quote. Large quotes should be avoided if possible since quotes of that size can be WP:COPYVIO concerns - plus the quote is promotional in tone so I'd recommend removing it if this ever does get restored.

It doesn't disqualify you, but you will have to disclose this conflict of interest on your user page and make sure to follow the WP:COI, WP:RS, WP:NPOV guidelines to a T. You should also disclose whether or not you are a freelance writer or work for a marketing company. Part of this is because it's very, very easy for marketing professionals to write in a promotional tone without ever meaning to. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]