User talk:RodgerCarter

I need assistance with with a short submission of about three pages. I may be reached a carterrodger@hotmail.com or dchis.com Thanks, Rodger RodgerCarter (talk) 19:59, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vincent J.Dunker. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help ^connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 00:24, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vincent J.Dunker.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 04:58, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the content was removed because the submission was composed of copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vincent J.Dunker.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —SW— ^soliloquize 21:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article submission, Rodger Carter

The article was written entirely by myself without any cut and pastes from any other document. The references I provided are there to demonstrate the veracity of the submission. URLs were provided in most cases so that the reader can easily check the sources from which the statements in the article originated. The only reference without a URL was for a book and a complete citation was made for that book so that it can easily be checked at most any library.

As to use of web sites, most everything is now searchable on the web. This does not mean that information was generated by a particular web site, but that it has merely become part of the vast amount of material that has been scanned or otherwise made available to researchers by being placed on the web. For example, citation 18 refers to a Dunker advertisement in the March 1936 issue of Popular Mechanics magazine with the page number given as usual in a citation. The URL allows the reader to go immediately to the site where that monthly issue was scanned and to verify the information for himself. This is the case with almost all of the material cited in my article. The only items not cited in this way are photographs which I have gathered on my own web site, dchis.com, most of which are scans from vintage Dunker flyers, or two scans from a book used with permission. If URLs cannot be used to direct readers to the material being discussed so that it can be verified, then it would seem that wikipedia itself is not to be considered a reliable source since it is a URL based enterprise.

If the reviewer would be more specific about which prose is considered to be improper, I believe I can demonstrate otherwise. Likewise the URL references. If the reviewer would prefer to discuss this by email I can be reached at carterrodger@hotmail.com.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sumitkumarjha75 (talk) 02:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added CC-BY-SA-3.0 to the top and bottom of the Dunker biography which I wrote and which is attached to the the 1950s page of my web site, DigiCamHistory.Com. A condensed version of that biography page was used for my submission to wikipedia for a wikipedia biography of Mr. Dunker. RodgerCarter

Dunker

I have created a redirect VE-JA-DE Cameras and added it to Category:Photography companies (which achieves what you wanted at cfd - you can't add Dunker himself to the category as he was not a company). Oculi (talk) 19:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Look at Category:Photography companies - you will see VE-JA-DE Cameras there, which takes you to the company section of the Dunker article. Oculi (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Naeger Dunker photoSmB.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Naeger Dunker photoSmB.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 19:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Vincent Joseph Dunker.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Vincent Joseph Dunker.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 19:48, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Naeger Dunker photoSmB.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Naeger Dunker photoSmB.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 19:48, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]