User talk:Roman Sakhan
January 2017
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Saka are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Saka for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 06:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Roman Sakhan, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Roman Sakhan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC) |
in Vikipedii no given about migration sak on territory a Sistan can graft about this history ? Roman Sakhan (talk) 10:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
February 2017
[edit]
Please stop making disruptive edits.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. This is obviously your IP, which you used to add the exact same information covered by the exact same edit summary on the Balasagan article. Read WP:SOCK, WP:RS and WP:VER. And that's just the tip of the iceberg; on the List of Iranian dynasties and countries, you added two complete bogus claims, apart from the loads of unsourced text you added on many other articles related to the Khanate of Kalat. I believe you're already well on your way to be labeled as WP:NOTHERE. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. I think your edits to various pages are in good faith, but they keep getting reverted because you don't have reliable sources for them. Instead of finding better sources you have taken to edit-warring to get them reinserted into the articles. You've also posted this, which reads like both a personal attack and a threat.
- I appreciate how irritating it is to have your edits reverted, but you really need to listen to what others are telling you, and find better sources for the material you want to add. When your edits are reverted you should also discuss them on the article talkpage (see WP:TALK) before restoring them to the page. And to the extent that your post to LouisAragon was either an attack or threat, you should knock this off entirely as its a swift path to having your account blocked from editing.
- Hope this is helpful information. Happy to discuss if required. -- Euryalus (talk) 05:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]Hi. Please observe civility and avoid personal attacks (like "fu"), or you may be blocked from editing without further warning. As an aside, are you sure you grasp the English language well enough to edit the English Wikipedia? Thanks. El_C 06:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Block
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. For abusing multiple accounts (94.102.184.35, 94.102.184.26) and general disruption. El_C 07:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)