User talk:RonaldGRoss
Hello, RonaldGRoss, and welcome to Wikipedia! | |
 Introduction 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia |
 How to write a great article |
| If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC. You can also place | |
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Your userpage
[edit]
Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to your userpage. That content has been deleted. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
I encourage you to help build the encyclopedia. Thank you, and happy editing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Again
[edit]I have deleted your user page again. It is intended for basic information about yourself or your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of leeway is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not a personal website, blog, or social networking medium, nor should it be used to promote yourself, or host a fake article, CV, or lengthy biography.
Are you interesting in helping to build this encyclopedia, or simply to use your userpage as a free webhost for a "profile" about yourself? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:19, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
++++++++++++++
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
This is my first attempt to work in the Wikipedia environment. I'm not trying to promote. I was just giving a standard professional bio.
Can you help me by telling me which parts are not acceptable?? My subsequent intent is specifically to add a new piece about the Business Rules Group standards work to Wikipedia (not a commercial group), and participate in editing material associated with its work ... "business rules", "Business Motivation Model", "SBVR", etc. etc. It would seem like professional background would help establish credibility ... but I am definitely not familiar with your mode of operation.
Thx
- A Wikipedia user page is a place to write something about you as an editor. It is not a page to promote your business endeavours nor yourself. Listing your various trademarks (including ™), for example, or your epithet, serves no purpose but self-promotion. As an aside, credibility isn't established by a fancy user page - on the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog. Credibility on Wikipedia is established by citing reliable sources that are independent of the subject. As an expert you'll know better where to look for such sources - that is one of the main advantages of expertise on Wikipedia. We do not, however, accept content merely becasue a Wikipedia editor says so, no matter what expertise that editor claims. Huon (talk) 00:12, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
01:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)01:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)01:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)01:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)RonaldGRoss (talk) 01:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
OK, I tried again. I'm sure you'll let me know if I succeeded this time.
Thx
Speedy deletion nomination of Business Rules Group
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Business Rules Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.brcommunity.com/b806.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 00:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted again
[edit]This is an encyclopedia. There are two places for content about you at Wikipedia:
- 1. An article! If you want an article about yourself, you should first read Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and WP:42. Then, find lots and lots of good sources that write about you. Then, please let me help. Paste the links here for me to see. If you are notable, I can help create the article for you.
- 2. Your userpage. It is not for a lengthy "profile". In fact, Wikipedia is not a free webhosting service for you to host any sort of profile. If you are a constructive editor here who helps build the encyclopedia, then a short bio is accepted. So, if you want your bio at your userpage, sure. But, it can only be a few sentences long.
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:58, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
02:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)02:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)02:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)02:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)~~
Re 1: Well that's an interesting thought and offer. I'll ponder. (But will I ever be able to find the message again. All very new to me.)
Re 2: OK, I'm getting it ... slowly. I'll try again. Short and sweet.
Thx
July 2015
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} and posting it below this notice (replacing "Your reason here ~~~~" with the reason), but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:52, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to make others aware of businessrulesgroup.org and the sourcing and external links at Business Motivation Model, and will leave it to them to decide if this is a concern or not. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
03:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)03:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)03:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)03:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)RonaldGRoss (talk) 03:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Oh my. Got blocked on my very first afternoon of Wikipedia editing. Not a good start. However, I think it would be best to wait to appeal the block. I'd like to get this right.
1. Could you look at my latest profile submission? Did you get it? Short and sweet, more suited to purpose I think(??).
2. Would it help if I put you in touch with some of the other members of the Business Rules Group? It's a completely volunteer, non-profit, non-incorporated group that spent many years pioneering the basic (shared) ideas of the business rules approach. It's a much smaller variant than say OMG, or GUIDE, or IIBA (other non-profits in IT that are documented in Wikipedia articles). I wrote the piece deliberately focused on the collective ideas of the group and how they have evolved. In part I wanted to do that because those ideas are sometimes misunderstood and misapplied. I think if one examines the piece carefully, there is nothing whatsoever of commercial / promotional content. (If inadvertently included I'll gladly excise it.) I actually spent a lot of time carefully documenting and referencing everything.
IAC, please advise on the best course of action.
Thx, Ron
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
P.S. I just saw this message: Enough is enough. You've just recreated your userpage with your webiste. I've blocked you indefinitely.
--> Is listing the websites the only problem?? I'll gladly delete them!! I thought I read somewhere that a URL was allowed if not surrounded by any text. (Never find the reference now.) BTW, I looked for samples of appropriate userpage write-ups, but I didn't find any to go by. Did I miss them? (Quite possible.) This is all very ironic since my specialty is rules(!). Oh well.
- The problem is that everything you have done so far has been to promote yourself and your organization. If you wish to appeal the block, please follow the instructions in the brown box above. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
RonaldGRoss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yesterday afternoon was my first attempt ever to edit Wikipedia. I was prepared for a learning curve, but it was more than expected. I believe I was blocked for the following reason: "The problem is that everything you have done so far has been to promote yourself and your organization.".
I know this statement applies to my user page, and possibly to the article I was trying to create on "Business Rules Group". I will answer both.
1. My user page. I have 42 years in the IT industry, where it is customary to use a bio listing accomplishments and associations. I assumed (wrongly) that would be appropriate for Wikipedia. I also assumed (wrongly) it would be a good place to practice Wikipedia scripting. With patient guidance from Ms. Anna Frodesiak, I whittled it down to what I finally thought would be acceptable (statement of interests and activities, rather than anything promotional). However, I left 2 URLS in it, unaccompanied by any text, as I interpreted would be allowed by the following statement from Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_pages): "You are also welcome to include a simple link to your personal home page, although you should not surround it with any promotional language." It's quite possible I misinterpreted that statement. IAC, the links can definitely be omitted. In fact, for fear of further problems, I'm prepared to simply leave the page blank for now until I better understand Wikipedia conventions in this regard. I was never doing this for promotional purposes. IAC, most people who read any material I might get involved with (all on "business rules" and related matters) probably have either heard of me or can easily find out whatever they want to know about me elsewhere. Not a biggie.
2. The article on the Business Rules Group (www.BusinessRulesGroup.org). This is definitely not "my" organization. (My company is www.BRSolutions.com. We also own www.BRCommunity.com, which we run for community service, not for profit.) Business Rules Group is (was) a volunteer group of 15-20 professionals from different organizations all over the world who contributed freely over many years (starting in 1989) to develop some important papers and standards in the area of business rules and related matters. It was not an incorporated group. It made outsized contributions to the field. It came up with the first definition of business rule, widely cited in the industry. One of its works, the Business Motivation Model, was adopted as a standard by Object Management Group (OMG). (I was one of the editors on that paper.) More recent work evolved into the OMG standard Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules. Except that its website is still live, the Business Rule Group is no longer really active. It's work and influence is therefore of significant historical and developmental importance and should be properly documented.
Additional Note: The article I submitted to Wikipedia on Business Rules Group (not promotional in any sense that I can think of, just very well documented) has been previously run on www.BRCommunity.com. I take it that was the reason for its speedy removal from Wikipedia. (As a publisher, I fully appreciate the caution Wikipedia has exercised in the matter! Kudos.) As owner of that site and copyright holder, I am fully prepared to relinquish any and all rights to the material, as I have said already. I have requested instructions about the best way to do that. (I prefer not to use a "copyleft notice" if there is a viable alternative.) I could use some help there.
Decline reason:
A Wikipedia userpage is designed to give relevant information about you as applies within Wikipedia. Your editing interests, skills and past history, if any, are relevant, as may be your aspirations. We have no interest in any of your past or present activities outside Wikipedia. As to your article, it was deleted for obvious reasons - promotion and copyright violation. Conflict of interest policy is also relevant. Is there anything else you want to write about?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- See WP:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to donate text and media, but do be aware that even if you donate text it may still be inappropriate for Wikipedia. Note that Wikipedia itself uses copyleft licenses (CC-By-SA 3.0 Unported and GFDL). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:01, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
I have just now sent copyright permission for http://www.brcommunity.com/b806.php to <permissions-en@wikimedia.org> as per the instructions.
The instructions also said to do the following, but I believe I am blocked (so this is just a reminder): "After sending the email, place "OTRS pending" (in double brackets) on the article's talk page."