User talk:Room345
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Room345! I noticed your contributions to Gini coefficient and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! Room345 (talk) 01:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to Denbigh School
[edit]I accidentally published my reversion of your edit before writing a proper edit summary. Thank you for your WP:good faith edit to Denbigh School, which with regret I had to revert for these reasons:
- The school's own website is not a great reference for itself. Not terrible but not great. See WP:SELFSOURCE for long explanation. Plus it is already given in the article.
- The more serious problem was your citation of https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/1873042. This is a copy of Wikipedia, so is not a WP:reliable source. For the formal policy statement, see WP:CIRCULAR; for the amusing version, see Citogenesis.
Please don't be discouraged: these mistakes are easy to make, and making mistakes is how we all learned how to wrangle Wikipedia editing. Thank you for trying to improve the article, do please continue to search for reliable sources. Have fun! John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:28, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- I did not want to cite them but for a huge portion of the history and old site sections were exact words from https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/1873042. Room345 (talk) 18:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Not exactly. The en-academic.com article is a straight copy of our article, so the "history and old site sections were exact words " there are from wikipedia. Not the other way round. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, that makes sense. What's the real source then? 2600:8805:9300:E00:4D2:4784:CFD4:DB99 (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- That was me not logged in, sorry. Room345 (talk) 20:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- It reads as though it was written from someone's personal experience. It is certainly credible but it lacks citations. To be honest, unless you are willing to read miles of microfilm for the Milton Keynes Citizen (held at the Central Library), I can't see how you or anyone will be able to cite the statements. The Citizen's archive doesn't seem to go back more than five years-ish and is difficult to navigate. Archive.org may have captured it but I wouldn't bet the house on it – and it would be a pig to find the relevant article. If I were you, I'd mark this one down to experience and choose another task, but you may be made of sterner stuff. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:44, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, thank you so much for all the guidance. I really appreciate it. Room345 (talk) 23:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- It reads as though it was written from someone's personal experience. It is certainly credible but it lacks citations. To be honest, unless you are willing to read miles of microfilm for the Milton Keynes Citizen (held at the Central Library), I can't see how you or anyone will be able to cite the statements. The Citizen's archive doesn't seem to go back more than five years-ish and is difficult to navigate. Archive.org may have captured it but I wouldn't bet the house on it – and it would be a pig to find the relevant article. If I were you, I'd mark this one down to experience and choose another task, but you may be made of sterner stuff. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:44, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- That was me not logged in, sorry. Room345 (talk) 20:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, that makes sense. What's the real source then? 2600:8805:9300:E00:4D2:4784:CFD4:DB99 (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Not exactly. The en-academic.com article is a straight copy of our article, so the "history and old site sections were exact words " there are from wikipedia. Not the other way round. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cold email, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Blogs entries on commercial websites like https://ironscales.com aren't considered reliable sources, per WP:BLOGS. Belbury (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! I only added a citation for existing information. Was the source I added unreliable? Room345 (talk) 17:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. Belbury (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- I've added two citations, one from IBM and the other from University of Wisconsin-Madison. Let me know if that works! Room345 (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. Belbury (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)