User talk:Rostabunny

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for contributing edits that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Help contents – the main help page.
Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to create your first article
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Once again, welcome! BlueNoise (talk) 16:29, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm Ixocactus. I noticed that you recently removed content from Del Bigtree without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ixocactus (talk) 17:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I posted the reason, I was trying to make the article more neutral. From my point of view, it was not very neutral at all, and I was just trying to improve it. Thanks, Rostabunny.

P.S.: do you have to be a mod to approve or disapprove edits? i just made a wikipedia account, so i'm pretty new. Rostabunny (talk) 18:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rostabuny, welcome to Wikipedia. The information presented in the articles needs to be supported by credible sources. When making changes, we should take care to stick to what the sources say. In the changes to the page mentioned above, you removed source-supported elements, and introduced new ones that are not in the sources, thus the reversal. Additions such as "abundance of credible guests on his show" look a lot like an editor's own personal evaluation, as nothing of the sort is mentioned in the sources listed. If you believe the tone of an article is off, I suggest you open a topic on its Talk Page and engage other editors in a discussion. Happy editing to you.

Except on protected pages, any editor may modified another's work (which is in effect what you did with your own changes). The vast majority of disagreements get resolved in the article Talk pages without the invervention of an administrator. Robincantin (talk) 21:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sounds good! Ill be more careful next time! Rostabunny (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. An edit that you recently made to North Bay, Ontario seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 22:49, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]