User talk:Roxiegrossman

New to Wikipedia

I am new to Wikipedia and I am finding it challenging to get started https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Roxiegrossman (talk) 21:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Roxiegrossman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! StarryNightSky11^(talk)^(cont) 21:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott Bachrach (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Interviews, mentions, etc. do not establish notability. What is needed is significant coverage from multiple reliable sources about him. See also the previous deletion discussion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scott Bachrach and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Scott Bachrach, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 23:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roxiegrossman! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 23:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scott Bachrach

Hello, Roxiegrossman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scott Bachrach, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scott Bachrach

Hello, Roxiegrossman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scott Bachrach".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jessica Klewicki Glynn (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the five (!) sources cited against the opening sentence provide the person's DOB, which raises the question — where is that information coming from? As for her education, Amazon is not a reliable source, and the university website does not mention her anywhere that I can see at least. (Note that references are not there to simply provide further information on something that was mentioned, in this case the degree programme, but must actually corroborate the statement made.) Per WP:BLP, every material statement, anything potentially contentious, and all private personal details such as DOB must be clearly supported by inline citations to reliable published sources. And please cut down on the REFBOMBING, we really don't need to see ten sources to verify the statement that her photos have been featured in some magazines. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jessica Klewicki Glynn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jessica Klewicki Glynn

Hello, Roxiegrossman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jessica Klewicki Glynn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]