User talk:Rutlandright

This is Rutlandright's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Job Bartholomew Tate has been accepted

Job Bartholomew Tate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Rutlandright. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 17:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Editing page on Jewish Bolshevism

This edit request to Jewish Bolshevism has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This page states that concept of Jewish involvement in the Bolshevik Revolution is a "canard." Asserting that a concept is a falsehood amounts to a value judgement and thus violates the neutrality requirement for Wikipedia articles. One may not agree with this concept but it has been studied in a number of books including The Generation: The Rise and Fall of the Jewish Communists of Poland (Society and Culture in East-Central Europe) by Schatz (1991), Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime by Pipes (1993), and The Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald (1998) among others. As an encyclopedic entry, the page on Jewish Bolshevism ought to include information in order to provide an accurate and comprehensive understanding of this issue. I advocate removing non-neutral and defensive language such as "canard" to restore objectivity to the page.

Rutlandright (talk) 18:36, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: this is the talk page for communicating with the user Rutlandright (talk · contribs). Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. SparklingPessimist ^{Scream at me!} 19:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to correct inaccuracies and non-neutral language on page, "Jewish Bolshevism"

This edit request to Jewish Bolshevism has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Remove all instances of the word "canard" (Use of word violates neutrality requirement for Wikipedia entries)

Change first paragraph to "Jewish Bolshevism, also known as Judeo-Bolshevism, refers to Jewish involvement in the Russian Revolution."

This article presents Jewish involvement in communist politics as a conspiracy theory when it is a historically evidenced fact as detailed in the following published books and articles:

The Generation: The Rise and Fall of the Jewish Communists of Poland (Society and Culture in East-Central Europe) by Schatz (1991)

Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime by Pipes (1993) The Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald (1998) "The Erasure of the American-Jewish Left" Rachel Cohen (2014) on Medium

Therefore, I am requesting permission to edit this semi-protected page to restore accuracy of content and neutrality of language.

Rutlandright (talk) 18:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: this is the talk page for communicating with the user Rutlandright (talk · contribs). Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. SparklingPessimist ^{Scream at me!} 19:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: Bombshell (sex symbol)

A topless photo of Sophia Loren does not seem germane to this article. Nudity is essential to pornography - not to a neutral, informative article on "Bombshell (sex symbol)."

It can be argued that this picture undermines a woman's ability to exude sensuality as a result of her personality, style, and demeanor. It reduces the construct of women as sex symbols to naked breasts. Could a more appropriate image be substituted to better serve the text of this article?

(Rutlandright (talk) 19:53, 25 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Job Tate

Hello, Rutlandright. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Job Tate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete Job Tate?

The article looks to be in good condition, and the subject passes the notability criteria. Why do you want to delete it now? —C.Fred (talk) 01:09, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have been told this former state representative will be creating his own page. A number of VT state representatives are doing so. I live in Vermont and formerly worked with the House Caucus. Thanks.

Are you connected with Tate? If not, WP would rather have a neutrally-written one than one written by the subject or somebody with a conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 01:15, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am connected with Tate. It would be best for someone neutral to write the article.

Nonetheless, the current article is now ineligible for speedy deletion under criterion G7, since I have made a substantive addition to it. —C.Fred (talk) 01:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is your substantive addition to it, may I ask? This whole article is written by me.

I just checked. I have furnished all the information on this page. Looks like you've made some links to other pages. I don't see that being substantive. What is your issue with deleting a page I wrote? This individual has long left public service and is no longer a public figure.

So did I. Besides, even if Job Tate is no longer a public figure, we still aught to keep the article. He already became notable for being a public figure, so that's that.--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 01:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: Let him delete the article. I will recreate it. Any problems with that?--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 01:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MollyPollyRolly: From scratch, or with his text? If the latter, yes, there's a problem: attribution. —C.Fred (talk) 02:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: From scratch.--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 02:30, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]