User talk:Rævhuld

This is my talk page. Please append all accolades, brickbats and threats to the bottom of the page.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rævhuld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What was the reason why I was blocked? I don't know. I just reported Volunteer Marek, who personally attacked me and other users - like instead of coming with arguments, he assumed the ideology of left-wing me and wrote "ridiculous" or "stupid" under comments. Furthermore he attacked users for being new. But instead of actually blocking bullies, Wikipedia just blocks people being bullied. Without even giving an actual reasoning. Great. Rævhuld (talk) 08:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Reviewing your edit history, not only am I declining the request, but I am changing it to an indefinite one for not being here to build an encyclopedia. There's no "bullying" going on, in fact this isn't the first time you've falsely accuse someone of bullying and "lying", and in fact you have been harrassing other users RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Cazza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cazza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cazza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Islamic terrorism in Europe (–2013)

Template:Islamic terrorism in Europe (–2013) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:00, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of June 2017 Brussels attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article June 2017 Brussels attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June 2017 Brussels attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Ways to improve The Apothecary Series (Books)

Hi, I'm AngusWOOF. Rævhuld, thanks for creating The Apothecary Series (Books)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources for the awards and some reviews for the books. Do not use goodreads (not reliable source) and don't use author's webpage execpt where it pertains to the conception and development of the book series. Need third-party reviews. Reviews needs to be in prose. Also need publishing information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carolineskolen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Carolineskolen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 13:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]