Jump to content

User talk:S4z

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:155 eastenders2-1-.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Images-10-.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Sonam kapoor1 1024x768-1-.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:PriyankaChopraLoveStoryEvent20March2008B-1-.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nadeem Razaq, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nadeem Razaq was changed by S4z (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-03-29T11:08:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Nadeem Razaq constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Seraphim♥ Whipp 16:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Nadeem Razaq. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Antonio Lopez (talk) 16:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Nadeem Razaq.  Marlith (Talk)  17:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sddttredhnjhv

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sddttredhnjhv, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Marlith (Talk)  17:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block

[edit]
Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 31 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Anthony.bradbury"talk" 17:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Ne-Yo discography. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. You've added speculative information about a future Vanessa Hudgens album to a number of articles. Please do not add this information until it can be backed up with a reliable source. —C.Fred (talk) 16:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Vanessa Hudgens. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kww (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Chris Brown discography. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 16:38, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


TBA

[edit]

Please don't add TBAs to articles. There's no need to add information until it is announced by a reliable source. You are already very, very near getting blocked. Please don't add more unverifiable information.Kww (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mouni Roy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article, No any reliable published sources. Fails WP:V

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. :-ChanderForYou 10:43, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]