User talk:SChannell

This is SChannell's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pathwise Complexity (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are no references in this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pathwise Complexity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pathwise Complexity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SChannell! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pathwise Complexity

Hello, SChannell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pathwise Complexity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:14, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spivak pronouns

Spivak pronouns were explicitly created to enable gender agnostic examples in typesetting with TeX.. Specifically they were added to enable scientific text to be typeset with the macro choice of female examples to encourage girls into STEM. It is a error to state that some people have a different definition to that published meaning

What sort of made up lies are these?FieldOfWheat (talk) 22:53, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to be more specific with "What sort of made up lies are these" - not sure which fact you're disputing

Michael Spivak - Wikipedia was a world-renowned mathematician, not prone to vague definitions. When E created eir pronouns, E used them to remove gender assumptions when addressing em. E designed TeX macros that could be typeset as "His thesis" or "Her thesis". Gender Queer pronouns may use the same set a Spivak pronouns, but that does not make them an alternate definition, just another definition with the same value SChannell (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]