User talk:Sagsbasel

Welcome!

Hi Sagsbasel! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 08:58, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion process

Hi! I noticed that, after I removed the speedy deletion tag from Jessica Pierce, you re-added it with the message "Did not follow procedure." Removing speedy deletion tags from pages that don't unambiguously and uncontroversially meet the criteria — as long as you aren't the creator of the article — is the normal procedure, and per WP:CSD, "If an editor other than the creator removes a speedy deletion tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the deletion is controversial and another deletion process should be used." In short, you should not use reverts to restore a speedy deletion tag. However, if you feel strongly that the article should be deleted, I encourage you to explain your reasoning on the talk page. ragesoss (talk) 15:14, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Pierce

The article is not eligible for WP:PROD. It has previously been nominated for deletion. Please do not add the tag again. I advise you familiarise yourself with the policy on proposed deletions before nominating any further articles. Josh Milburn (talk) 10:14, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You told me to nominate it? Sagsbasel (talk) 10:30, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

You were warned by Galobtter here about personal attacks. This comment, again, crosses a line; there's no need for you to be so disparaging towards me or Pierce. Please stop being so aggressive and dismissive; if you continue, there is a very good chance that you will find yourself blocked. Josh Milburn (talk) 10:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]