User talk:Saifullah.vguj

Faisal and Iqbal[edit]

This edit [1] doesn't seen to refer to Weizmann? Can you explain where? I also looked at The Call of the Marching Bell. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Related to edit in Faisal-weizmann Agreement wiki page[edit]

The sher stanza no.2 in bang e dara poem is as follow Kya Khub Amir Faisal Ko Sanussi ne paigham diya, Tu Naam e nasab ka hijazi hai par dil ka hijazi ban na saka. Translation: What a thing Sanousi told to Emir Faisal, You are Hejazi from birth but not from your heart (due to your agreement)

This indirectly refers to the agreement, where even though people of hejaz were against the agreement but Faisal proceeded. Saifullah.vguj (talk) 13:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 coronavirus lockdown in India. Shanze1 (talk) 07:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me the reason of block, and explain the reason of it. Saifullah.vguj (talk) 07:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to provide a reliable source for your edits, e.g. the content added by you with this edit is unsourced. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Aarogya Setu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saifullah.vguj, In this edit, you removed sourced information, claiming it to be "tabloid journalism". You've been previously warned about your disruptive editing, and you seem to show no remorse for the same, hence the only warning. SerChevalerie (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are trying Vandalise the page Aarogya Setu without adding the real and true info. Moreover it is not the first time you are threatening someone with a block of their edit is different from you. So SerChevalerie explain this. Saifullah.vguj (talk) 10:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Basmala. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please read the discussions on the article talk page, and if you have strong arguments in favour of changing the spelling, present them on that talk page first and make sure that you get a consensus to change it. Then, and only then, can you edit the spelling. Changing it before there is such a consensus is not constructive. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 15:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User Page:bonadea correcting the edit if its true is not even disruptive if you can read that arabic calligraphy then you too should have corrected. Saifullah.vguj (talk) 17:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop trying to change the article of Basmala into Urdu. Your spellings are all Urdu, not Arabic. Please learn the difference between the two languages. — LissanX (talk) 01:00, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I already know the difference between the two language and thats why I am writing about it. By the way LissanX has been blocked Saifullah.vguj (talk) 03:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the past, but that doesn't mean they are not right. Your opinions really don't matter here, see no original research. We only care about what reliable sources say. You can be blocked (by another Admin, not me) for disruptive editing if you continue to make these changes without consensus on the talk page. Doug Weller talk 12:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well moreover the article should use proper translation that hasnt been provided. No matter what the idea behind your edit is please add proper citation for edit. Saifullah.vguj (talk) 16:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NOTVAND. This and this was completely inappropriate. --bonadea contributions talk 17:16, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read <vd> Saifullah.vguj (talk) 17:26, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020 II[edit]

Hi, Saifullah.vguj. Please don't use templates if you don't know how they work. The links with curly brackets are templates, so please avoid them until you become more experienced. Among other things, you posted a template on Doug Weller's page that said he has been blocked. I have reverted those edits of yours. Also please note that you're mistaken in thinking Doug has made "non-authentic" edits. Bishonen | tålk 17:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some article expansion help[edit]

Greetings,

Requesting your visit to following articles and help expand the same if any of the following topic interests you.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for recommendations, I will surely try to upkeep such topics and add whatever relevant things are related to the topics Saifullah.vguj (talk) 05:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of places named Khan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of places named Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of places named Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 05:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]