User talk:SalimEarle

July 2018[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Also, a Wikipedia talk page is for messages and discussions about work for the encyclopaedia: it is not a place to post content unrelated to work for Wikipedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Undercurrent News (August 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SportingFlyer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I think it's a good start, but I don't see any reliable secondary sources (non-blog) which cover the company significantly in the source list. I did a search and it's a bit of an awkward topic to source based on WP:GNG since so many articles on the site come up, but I can't accept it yet. Many of the sources are primary or links to company directories.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Undercurrent News and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Undercurrent News, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer talk 12:53, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SalimEarle! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SportingFlyer talk 12:53, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Undercurrent News[edit]

Hello, SalimEarle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Undercurrent News.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]