User talk:Sam at LI-COR

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sam at LI-COR, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 08:09, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for commenting on my article. I have been confused about how to include references that establish notability for a while. But first, I need to stress one important point regarding your comments on my talk page:
  • I have chosen my user name to be transparent about the COI and to show that this is a single user account only. Please see the summary on my user page.
Now, about the article…
  1. Journal references that cite Image Studio Lite (not the full version) have been put in the Further reading section to establish notability specific to the Lite version. Would adding a “Uses” section that references some of these studies work to more explicitly establish notability?
  2. On the AFC page, you mention that the article is not written as an advert, but you mention on my talk page that the COI may make it difficult to write neutrally about the topic. If you found anything that doesn’t sound neutral, could you please point it out to me?
Thanks again for helping me. Sam at LI-COR (talk) 15:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, it has come to my attention that Image Studio Lite has over 10,000 users. I won't add that to the article, obviously, but I think it establishes notability. Sam at LI-COR (talk) 15:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Sam at LI-COR. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Arthur goes shopping (talk) 16:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Sam at LI-COR. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Arthur goes shopping (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Response to request for review[edit]

Sorry, I have no idea how to review articles on Wikipedia, other than reading through it and stating that I think the article is good to go.

--Dscho (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dscho: Reading through the article and telling me your opinion would be very helpful! It will help me get the article up to speed for the Wiki editors who will eventually move the article to the Main Article Space. I would greatly appreciate feedback from a software Wikipedian. -- Sam at LI-COR (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • As I said, I think the article is good. Sorry to be not of more help: I am basically not a Wikipedian. To speak the truth, I stumbled over your message only by random chance; I usually do not check messages on Wikipedia (I still use old-fashioned email).

--Dscho (talk) 17:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dscho: Ohh... I understand now. Sorry, in the OP I didn't realize you were saying you read the article and think it's good, not you could read it and say if it was good. Glad to hear you think it works. Thank you for your time! --Sam at LI-COR (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Image Studio Lite (April 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Retartist (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Sam at LI-COR. You have new messages at Retartist's talk page.
Message added 01:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Also check my new comment at your AFC Retartist (talk) 01:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Sam at LI-COR. You have new messages at Retartist's talk page.
Message added 12:49, 26 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Retartist (talk) 12:49, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Sam at LI-COR. You have new messages at Retartist's talk page.
Message added 22:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Retartist (talk) 22:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Sam at LI-COR. You have new messages at Retartist's talk page.
Message added 23:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Retartist (talk) 23:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Image Studio Lite (June 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Fiddle Faddle 08:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Sam at LI-COR, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Sam at LI-COR. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 17:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fiddle Faddle 17:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Image Studio Lite concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Image Studio Lite, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Image Studio Lite concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Image Studio Lite, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Image Studio Lite[edit]

Hello Sam at LI-COR. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Image Studio Lite".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Image Studio Lite}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. LorTalk 02:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Image Studio Lite (March 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowager was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Snowager-is awake 06:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Image Studio Lite has been accepted[edit]

Image Studio Lite, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Snowager-is awake 21:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sam_at_LI-COR&oldid=874409449"