User talk:Sambyal

Welcome![edit]

Hi Sambyal! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 15:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Loafiewa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Modern Sub Machine Carbine, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 20:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Hey one of your recent edits at Salaar: Part 1 – Ceasefire has been reverted as they did not appear constructive. As per Wikipedia:ICTFSOURCES box office should be labelled with estimation tag. Secondly Wikipedia don't consider Production house Figures as Reliable. We consider Independent box office trackers as reliable source. As our sources differs we label box office as a Range. Don't remove it further. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 13:55, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you removed topically relevant content from Adani Group. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think the material should be removed from the article, you should make the case for this on the article talk page. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All accusations have been refuted by supreme court of India Sambyal (talk) 18:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to use the article talk page to gain consensus for such changes.

Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopaedia. Articles must not take sides, but should explain the sides, fairly and without editorial bias. This applies to both what you say and how you say it. If as you say, all accusations have been refuted by the Indian supreme court, there will be reliable sources to back this up. If they exist, they could be used to improve the article, so that it says (a) what the accusations were, and (b) how we know that the accusations were false (if they were false). This concept is called having a neutral point of view.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Reliance Industries. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Adani Group. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, as you did at Adani Group, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further disruptive removal of material.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]