User talk:Samthemaniloveut

It is suspected that this user has used one or more accounts abusively.

The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended.
(Account information: block log • suspected sockpuppets • confirmed socks)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Samthemaniloveut, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! StephenBuxton (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Minority (band)

A tag has been placed on Minority (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. StephenBuxton (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Note copied from article talk page) As it looks like you want to contest the page, I've added the Hang On tag to the page. As to their cultural significance, Wikipedia has a set of guidelines as to what makes a singer or music ensemble notable. Read the criteria at WP:Music, and see if the band meets any of the requirements. If they do, update the article accordingly (with references/external links), and your article will be gladly accepted.

As an aside, can you please make sure you sign your comments when posting on a discussion or user talk page? All you need to do is add 4 tilde (~) signs at the end of your comment. An even easier way is (when editing) to click on the signature icon at the top of the edit box. This is the one that is just to the right of the w in a red circle with a line through it. If you have any questions, comments or concerns, please drop me a line on my talk page. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Idi Amin Dada. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Xymmax (talk) 02:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alowicious BeauDeLay

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Alowicious BeauDeLay, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Xymmax (talk) 02:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of An Exaltation of Larks

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as An Exaltation of Larks, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Xymmax (talk) 02:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Alowicious BeauDeLay. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Xymmax (talk) 02:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Xymmax, you will be blocked from editing. KnightLago (talk) 02:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samthemaniloveut (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi I just logged on after a period of inactivity and it seem someone has haked into my account a reapeatedly acted like a disrespectfu troll. Please see to unvblocking me swiftly as I am just itching to edit a page on maritime history. Thankyou, Samthemaniloveut

Decline reason:

You are responsible for your account and its actions. I suggest you change your password and log out when not using it. — _(1 == 2)^Until 00:37, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Samthemaniloveut (talk) 00:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samthemaniloveut (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a very immature stance to take to speak frankly. How is a website of this nature able to operate when its administrators are so drunken by the power bestowed upon them. The advice you have given me regarding changing my password is moot as I cannot use wikipedia due to a total block on my IP address. I request that the administration rfrain from being so pedantic in these matters as this situation is most inconvenient. I look forward to the removal of the block, by the administration in the nest hour. Thankyou

Decline reason:

Give it a rest, not a single edit from your account has been productive since the first edit, your request is denied. Blocks to an IP caused by a block on an account expire after 48 horus or so. — _(1 == 2)^Until 00:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samthemaniloveut (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I HAVENT GOT 48 hours to wait JUST FULLY UNBLOCK MY ACCOUNT NOW ...

Decline reason:

That sort of response is an excellent example of why this account is blocked, even before we factor in the repeated creation of nonsense pages and harassment of other users. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have removed your personal attack and also removed your ability to edit this page. _(1 == 2)^Until 00:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]