User talk:Sanaaglander
re: the fact of sool,sanaag&cayn
[edit]Hello, Re: Somalia and my map
The situation in Sool and Sanaaq, where the actual rulership of the country is by the Boqor or Ugas of the most powerful Qabiil in the area, is not unique. This situation exists in every one of the competing Somali states except the ICU, where Qabiil is forced to take a much reduced secondary role to individual prestige and respect amongst the Sheikhs. In Southwestern Somalia and Gedo, the situation has entirely degenerated to Qabiil-based rule and the TFG has become a sort of Qabiil "League of Nations".
However, these Qabiil DO acknowledge the authority of the states in which they reside, most of the time, and if they don't then that state has no power there. This is why Sool and Sanaaq are disputed between Puntland and Somaliland, because some of the Qabiil wish to be part of Puntland and some other Qabiil want to be part of Somaliland.
The district map I used was primarily constructed to facilitate understanding of the war, and is not assumed to be 100% accurate as to the exact boundaries. Districts tend to change over time. However I believe it displays the strategic value of the districts. --Ingoman 16:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Map of territorial dispute
[edit]Hello! Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia. However, we are going to ensure we show maps of the territorial dispute between Somaliland, Puntland, and Somalia. It is part of the history of the Sanaag and Sool regions, and we should not remove the map of the disputed area without a specific reason, which you can put on the talk page. --Petercorless 15:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Sanaag.jpg.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Sanaag.jpg.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
