User talk:Saturn301

Speedy deletion nomination of Narborough island tortoise[edit]

Hello Saturn301,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Narborough island tortoise for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Celestinesucess (talk) 15:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Followup[edit]

Hi Saturn301, I've redirected the page you greated to Subspecies of Galápagos tortoise, which (I think) covers all of what you were trying to add. It appears from that page that we generally don't create articles on specific subspecies, but instead describe them on that page instead. If I missed any new info you added, you can add that to the overall subspecies page. or, let me know here if you disagree with the redirect. I'll leave you a welcome template below with some info on editing here. Sorry the start as rocky, and welcome. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can't seem to catch a break; one of our "bots", which tries to revert vandalism, reverted your two recent edits. I've clarified those aren't vandalism, but neither one was correct, I'm afraid. Foxes is an overview article about several species, some of whom are not threatened, and some of whom are. And, looking at otheer dinosaur articles, we don't bother listing dinosaur species as "extinct", as that would be kind of unnecessary clutter. Let me know if you run into further bot troubles; I just happened to see this show up on your talk page here, but am not online all the time. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you slow down a little? I understand there's a learning cureve here sometimes, but as a result people keep having to undo things you've done. You can't just copy a whole article to another page, like you did at Croatian Puma. Most of that article isn't applicable, and it's a copyright violation. And while Basilewsky's cranefly seems to be a real thing that doesn't appear to have an article, we can't really leave it in the state it's in now. If you'd like to ease into this, I can move Basilewsky's cranefly into your personal sandbox area, where you can fiddle with it, compare it to other articles, learn to format in peace, etc. But as you've seen, trying to dive in headfirst into article writing can lead to frustration. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Saturn301, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Floquenbeam (talk) 16:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Cougar, you may be blocked from editing. --Mr Fink (talk) 20:30, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Cougar. --Mr Fink (talk) 20:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Cougar. --Mr Fink ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 20:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at African elephant. Stop putting in incorrect information, or you will be blocked again.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:24, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mean Streak has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mean Streak was changed by Saturn301 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952492 on 2016-09-17T09:00:48+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Cougar. --Mr Fink (talk) 15:28, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pinta Island tortoise. --Mr Fink (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]