User talk:Sayyed.mt

March 2021[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sayyid, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:51, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All article content has a valid source, why should content be deleted? Sayyed.mt (talk) 23:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashraf Ghani's speech in Persian is available on the website of the President of Afghanistan Sayyed.mt (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I sent a message to the user who deleted my content but did not reply Sayyed.mt (talk) 00:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this continues, I will report to the Wikipedia administrators Sayyed.mt (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you do that, you will most likelly be banned for violating the 3-revert rule. So far I have counted at least 5 reverts from you, you may not continue to revert. Bring the subject to the article talk-page. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

warning[edit]

Your recent editing history at Sayyid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Night Wolf¹²²³ 22:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NightWolf1223: Unfortunately, I spoke with the editor. Unfortunately, none of them offer a convincing reason to delete the content. For example dies User Hamkar 99 (talk · contribs)

Sayyed.mt (talk) 22:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also protested in the bulletin boards. Unfortunately there was no one Sayyed.mt (talk) 23:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I protested on these pages Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard ، Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring But no one listened to my complaint. Sayyed.mt (talk) 23:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a moment to review your situation. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MJL: Excellent, please report the final result to me! Sayyed.mt (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sayyid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India's Collaborations of the month invites you[edit]

You're specially invited to join the WikiProject India's Collaboration of the month program.

The collaboration will help promote many articles to the good and featured article status, but to do so, we need your help! For further information, see the main page of the collaboration.

Sign up for this collaboration by listing your username under the participants section and regularly participating in the collaboration. If you have already signed, please ignore this message.

You can discuss this newsletter here.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Sent by Hulged ⟨talk⟩ on behalf of WikiProject India. Thank you!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]