User talk:Scarfy420

March 2023

Hello, I'm StarryNightSky11. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nelson, Nebraska without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. StarryNightSky11 ☎ 03:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ah, simply a mistake I made, feel free to revert it Scarfy420 (talk) 22:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Serina: a natural history of the world of birds (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Silikonz were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Deviantart, Google Sites, and YouTube are not reliable sources because they are self-published.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Serina: a natural history of the world of birds and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Silikonz💬 23:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scarfy420! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Silikonz💬 23:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Austronesian Otter

Hello, Scarfy420. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Austronesian Otter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Serina: a natural history of the world of birds

Hello, Scarfy420. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Serina: a natural history of the world of birds, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Austronesian Otter

Hello, Scarfy420. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Austronesian Otter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Superior, Nebraska, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Superior, Nebraska. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed lol, I cited it Scarfy420 (talk) 21:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diedersdorfer Heide and Großbeerener Graben landscape conservation area (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The lack of in-line sources make this very difficult to assess. It also reads like a translation from German into English without subsequent copy-editing for grammatical nuances. Please convert the list of references at the end into appropriately formatted in-line references so that it is more easily possible to make a judgment about notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diedersdorfer Heide and Großbeerener Graben landscape conservation area and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]