User talk:Scartboy

Translation

Regarding your interest in Wikipedia in different languages, see Wikipedia:Translation. Rockpocket 20:06, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander at Issus

Im not sure if you have access to any online libaries or if many german language books have been scanned by google, but The Battle of Alexander at Issus is undergoing a review process [1], and one of the concerns is that the sources it draws from are narow; the battle scene comes from a German painter, and most of the major texts describing and explaining are in German and have'nt been translated into English (see Johnbod's comments). Its not that any of the article's statements are in doubt, but more that the variety of sources used are not broad enough to get a rounded view. The review process is basically to decide if the page is ok to into the 'todays featured article' section on the wiki main page. Anything you can find, suggest or throw up on the talk page......? In other news, 2010 promises to top 2009's flood and ice with pesticalance and famine. Feck anyway. Ceoil (talk) 02:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See here. Ceoil ^sláinte 19:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Favour again

I want to take Portrait of a Woman (Rogier van der Weyden, Washington) to WP:FAC but am short so far on sources. He was Netherlandish, so assuming that your Dutch is still up to snuff, can you see if there is much out there in Dutch or German. Lorne Campbell seems to be the leading expert and writes in English, but I suspect most of the early analysis was in Dutch. Portrait of a Woman is a very generic title, when google searching I go for van der Weyden, Washington. O and my sound is working great now...hadn't head music since 25th Nov, except radio crap! Am I getting older or does music these days suck. Ceoil (talk) 11:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[2]. Ceoil (talk) 23:25, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gerards

Splashed out on a new computer, and cabels, and huge amounts of cardboard, and all for 300 quid. Internet working fine now, so dont have to watch telly on telly anymore. Any interest in a visit to the city, or a pint in gerards, as if there is anything wrong with it! Ceoil 01:01, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gaelic typefaces

Hi there,

In your edit comment on Gaelic typefaces, you wrote "perceived in Ireland as as having cultural value - condescending comment and lacking citation - consider "unique style" and "traditional charm""

I'm not an Irish typographer myself, but I've been to numerous recent presentations by Irish typographers (notably but not only when the international typography conference was in Dublin last year). It seems to me that it is very accurate and not at all condescending to summarize their perception of preserving and using Gaelic as being of cultural value. It's why Michael Everson just went to considerable lengths to get Gaelic specifically included in the Vox/ATypI classification system. "Traditional charm" sounds much more condescending to me! "Unique style" is just a bit tautological and uninteresting, could apply to any other style really.

--Thomas Phinney (talk) 22:41, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of the Frontiers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of the Marne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delayed response: Thanks for the heads-up, I corrected the link. Scartboy (talk) 22:14, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Scartboy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Scartboy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Scartboy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]