User talk:Schwijker

Welcome!

Hello, Schwijker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Kendrick7^talk 17:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Schwijker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Schwijker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Fries King" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fries King. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 26#Fries King until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia Reh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Claudia Reh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

The current sourcing does not support notability of this person at this time. What is needed: verifiable, in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources that are fully independent of the person. Netherzone (talk) 16:11, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now enough sources and references in the article? --Schwijker (talk) 19:10, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your response, but it seems that you do not at this time understand what is considered a reliable source for the encyclopedia. Reliable sources are things like secondary sources such as newspaper articles (not press releases, but articles or reviews with a byline and content not based on a press release); magazine articles or reviews (for example in ARTFORUM magazine, Frieze, etc.) or articles in academic journals that are fully vetted and peer-reviewed; chapters in books from notable publishers. Unfortunately none of the citations you added in good faith to the article are considered reliable sources per Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. What are needed are secondary sources that are in-depth, significant coverage in reliable published sources that are fully independent of the person. Below is an analysis of why the current sourcing does not meet WP guidelines:

Not independent: Calendar listing for an event [1]
Not a reliable source: Blog [2]
Not independent: Press release, not an independent article or review about her or her work [3]
Not independent: Calendar listing [4]
Not independent: Festival route map [5]
Not independent: Festival route map [6]
Not independent: Press release [7]
Not independent: Festival bio paragraph [8]
Not independent: Festival participant page [9]
Not independent: User-submitted material, artist’s self-published video [10]
Not independent: User-submitted material, artist’s self-published video [11]
Unreliable source: YouTube is not considered a reliable source and it’s a user-submitted entry [12]
Unreliable source: User submitted content: [13]
Flicker with pictures on it is not a reference [14]
Not independent: User submitted content bio [15]

Here are some links that may be helpful to you as you search for independent significant coverage in reliable sources: WP:N, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV. What is of critical importance are sources (references) that are high quality, the number of sources is not as important - quality, not quantity is key. Hope that helps! Netherzone (talk) 23:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, got it. More and more articles in newspapers are behind pay walls. Can they be used anyway? Schwijker (talk)

What is of key importance is verifiability that editors/reviewers can actually read the content in references to check against the content in articles and drafts - this is for accuracy and neutrality. Guidelines are spelled out in the wikilinks in the first message above: WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:42, (WP:V, WP:5. I removed the calendar listing. It seems that one of the remaining refs is a blogger site, these seldom have editorial boards. I encourage you to continue to try to improve the draft and please have patience. It can take a while for drafts to be reviewed. Best regards, Netherzone (talk) 22:40, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Claudia Reh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Claudia Reh. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 06:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is personal homepage of the artist reliable enough for that kind of information? --Schwijker (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claudia Reh (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paper9oll was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Claudia Reh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claudia Reh has been accepted

Claudia Reh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Netherzone (talk) 15:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]