User talk:ScienceLion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ScienceLion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Politics. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dawn Bard (talk) 02:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Politics. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 02:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

September 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Sriharsh1234. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to David Pearce (philosopher) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sriharsh1234 10:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion[edit]

WP:PROD#Objecting: "If anyone, including the article creator, removes a {{proposed deletion}} tag from an article, do not replace it, even if the tag was apparently removed in bad faith." ⁓ Hello71 14:04, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Grayling[edit]

Hi - I hope it is OK have moved your recent addition to our Grayling page to its talk page as I think it might be a problem and I think should have more discussion if it is to be included. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 14:53, 26 December 2012 (UTC))

Nomination of David Pearce (philosopher) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Pearce (philosopher) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pearce (philosopher) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjmulder (talkcontribs) 20:42, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

David Pearce (philosopher)[edit]

You need to learn how Wikipedia works before you start trying to delete articles. You cannot prod articles that have already survived AfD and you cannot reprod articles that have been deprodded. You can take it to AfD again, but it has already survived three attempts. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

You are entirely mistaken. I suggest you read WP:PROD. "If anyone, including the article creator, removes a {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from an article, do not replace it, even if the tag was apparently removed in bad faith." The confusion is entirely yours. A prod can be removed for any reason or none. An article which has survived an AfD clearly should not be prodded, as AfD is a more complex process. I am entirely neutral as to whether Pearce should or should not have an article, but I will not allow an article to be deleted without due process being observed. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:52, 20 September 2014 (UTC)