User talk:Sckkay56

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Tiruchirappalli has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tiruchirappalli was changed by Sckkay56 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954007 on 2014-01-20T03:35:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ariel Sharon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ariel Sharon was changed by Sckkay56 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963973 on 2014-01-20T18:26:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:26, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Egyptian constitutional referendum, 2014, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Egyptian constitutional referendum, 2014 was changed by Sckkay56 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924641 on 2014-01-20T18:29:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sekhemre Khutawy Sobekhotep, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sekhemre Khutawy Sobekhotep was changed by Sckkay56 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958393 on 2014-01-20T18:31:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i do what i goat do i don't care if i get caught

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 19:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sckkay56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

w/e i will just move to a divert ip address meet some girls and create a new account can't stop won't stop the life of a sock puppetSckkay56 (talk) 19:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sckkay56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

if you do not un block me wikipedia will never be free from the clutches of the virgen admins ps i have had sex

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. I'm removing talk page access now. only (talk) 21:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.