User talk:Scottysmith3

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Eggnog has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO ^Hail! 10:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Salsa (dance) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Comet styles 10:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Samba. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Samba was changed by Scottysmith3 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-01-28T10:22:07+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:22, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Modern art.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Modern art.JPG. The copy called Image:Modern art.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 15:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to RuneScape, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: RuneScape was changed by Scottysmith3 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-03-03T15:36:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Arab. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Arab was changed by Scottysmith3 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-03-03T15:37:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Microsoft Word, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Microsoft Word was changed by Scottysmith3 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-03-03T15:37:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, thus it has been blocked indefinitely.

--Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 15:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Temple in rs.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Temple in rs.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Modern art.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Modern art.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ricky81682 (talk) 08:00, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Modern-art.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Modern-art.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Temple in rs.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Temple in rs.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]