User talk:Serols/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Serols. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Force One (SUV)
I edited out the portion which made it look biased and partial/commercial/marketing. How is this not constructive? I fail to understand.
I made edits in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_One_(sport_utility_vehicle)
Quite a significant part of the whole page sounds like a praise and looks very partial like advertisement. It feels like it is doing marketing for Force Motors... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.250.205.51 (talk) 23:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello 99.250.205.51, please use the talk-page, before you delete anything. Regards --Serols (talk) 10:00, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Raptor house
The name of this song is raptor house created by dj baba in venezuela, the term tuki, is an insult they use in to refer to this music, so I think that should be modified the title of the article by Raptor house. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sala.x.sala (talk • contribs) 12:18, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Are you there?
Why isn't his name Harry Styles in 1994 instead of Hunter Stetz in Zayn's? --174.109.221.236 (talk) 12:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comments are unwanted in the article. --Serols (talk) 12:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
WP:PROD deletion
Please do not reinstate validly contested WP:PROD templates. You are the one being disruptive and acting against policy at Owan. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello 86.17.222.157, you can work , but please don´t delete the proposed deletion text block. --Serols (talk) 12:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- I certainly don't need your permission to work, and, once again, I was following the standard procedure by removing the proposed deletion template, and you were acting disruptively against policy by restoring it. Please read WP:PROD for confirmation of this. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- And now you have reverted the article to the crappy condition it was in before I improved it. Please revert that change. I will not do so because I have no intention of following you into an edit war, but please take this as a formal warning for disruptive editing. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- I do not take back my editing, I have not removed the text block. --Serols (talk) 12:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- And now you have reverted the article to the crappy condition it was in before I improved it. Please revert that change. I will not do so because I have no intention of following you into an edit war, but please take this as a formal warning for disruptive editing. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- I certainly don't need your permission to work, and, once again, I was following the standard procedure by removing the proposed deletion template, and you were acting disruptively against policy by restoring it. Please read WP:PROD for confirmation of this. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Archiving
Hi Serols, I think you need to start archiving your talk page, as it's going to take longer to load as it keeps growing. You can get a bot to do this automatically, for example by adding this script to the top of your page (it won't work automatically here because of the <nowiki>
<nowiki> templates I've added around it:
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | age=2160 | archiveprefix={{SUBST:FULLPAGENAME}}/Archive | numberstart=1 | maxarchsize=75000 | header={{Automatic archive navigator}} | minkeepthreads=5 | minarchthreads=3 | format= %%i }}
Thanks, --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 12:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Rubbish computer, thank you for your help. Have a nice day --Serols (talk) 16:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- No problem, you too. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 17:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
PROD at Owan
Hello Serols! I've undone your recent revert to Owan. @Robert McClenon: had proposed it for deletion, but then an editor objected to the deletion by removing the PROD tag. Once a PROD has been objected to, a new PROD cannot be reinstated (see the first few paragraphs of WP:PROD. If you strongly feel the article ought to be deleted, consider proposing it for deletion at WP:AFD. Happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Ajpolino, thank you for the information. Have a good day. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Thank you for your vandalism help ! Sagecandor (talk) 19:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC) |
Martyr of the Free Word
What is the right procedure to change an obvious spelling mistake? Would a minor edit be more appropriate? I changed the spelling to be in accordance to mentions in other articles about this song as well as official sources. Do I need to discuss the source? 95.97.69.169 (talk) 19:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.97.69.169 (talk) 19:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello 95.97.69.169, please use the source. Regards --Serols (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Zorro 1987
Dear Serols, what kind of "unconstructive edits" or "vandalize" are you talking about? Are you serious? I'm editing and add some informations that respect the TRUE. You might consider to check these informations before erase them! Your contribution is not clear and I think it's only your personal opinion. Thank you very much for your wikipedia help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.92.29.229 (talk) 17:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello 213.92.29.229, link-spam is undesirable in Wikipedia. --Serols (talk) 10:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
List of NC-17 Films
If you bothered to fact check any of my edits, which you didn't, you would see that they are all justified. That page is a mess and many films listed on there are user applied with no citation whatsoever. I removed the films I could confirm were NEVER given that rating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:8:7:0:0:0:70 (talk) 08:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hello 2600:387:8:7:0:0:0:70, why do you delete Bram Stoker's Dracula, Braveheart and so on? --Serols (talk) 08:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- As clearly stated above, they were removed because they never received the NC-17 rating. Upon fact checking the article, I found that these films were not rated NC-17 by the MPAA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:8:7:0:0:0:70 (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hello 2600:387:8:7:0:0:0:70, do you have links? --Serols (talk) 08:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- http://m.zimbio.com/Beyond+the+Box+Office/articles/6xsjRiG51GL/20+Things+Never+Knew+Braveheart. Additionally, http://filmratings.com, the official website of the MPAA can confirm that none of these films received that rating simply by typing the title of the films in question into the search bar. You can also fact check the article yourself. Again, it is a complete mess with no factual evidence to back up many of the films listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:8:7:0:0:0:70 (talk) 08:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hello 2600:387:8:7:0:0:0:70, see here. Please use references, when you delete anything. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will be sure to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:8:7:0:0:0:70 (talk) 08:59, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- "Please use references, when you delete anything." No, that's not how WP:V works, it's "Please use references, when you *add* anything." 2601:281:8900:7A22:ACF3:F2BB:2A8C:46EB (talk) 18:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- @2601:281:8900:7A22:ACF3:F2BB:2A8C:46EB (talk · contribs): Actually Serols is correct. You are taking one rule out of context, misusing it, and ignoring many others. Burden of proof (so to speak) is on the current editor (not past editors), whether adding or deleting. When someone is reverting obvious vandalism, WP:V does not apply. Deleting content without evidence to refute existing content, is obvious vandalism. WP:PRESERVE states that existing content should not be deleted without good reason. WP:CITE a WP:RS applies to both addition and deletion. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 19:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello 2600:387:8:7:0:0:0:70, see here. Please use references, when you delete anything. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- http://m.zimbio.com/Beyond+the+Box+Office/articles/6xsjRiG51GL/20+Things+Never+Knew+Braveheart. Additionally, http://filmratings.com, the official website of the MPAA can confirm that none of these films received that rating simply by typing the title of the films in question into the search bar. You can also fact check the article yourself. Again, it is a complete mess with no factual evidence to back up many of the films listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:8:7:0:0:0:70 (talk) 08:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hello 2600:387:8:7:0:0:0:70, do you have links? --Serols (talk) 08:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- As clearly stated above, they were removed because they never received the NC-17 rating. Upon fact checking the article, I found that these films were not rated NC-17 by the MPAA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:8:7:0:0:0:70 (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Syllabification
Syllabification of "Katrina" (spaces between syllables)? 139.192.232.120 (talk) 11:31, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- What has this to do with your change? --Serols (talk) 11:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
lather (JJefferson Airplane)
I think that I'll nevermore try to contribute. So YOUR Wikipedia will attain the stability you thrive for, as fossils of this time --Pjacquot (talk) 12:49, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Pjacquot, I regret your decision. You should have a reference for your editing. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello again. I said I THOUGHT nevermore to contribute. I was a bit upset then. Now I reconsider. What could be considered as a sufficient reference ? Should it be included in my edit comment, or maybe in the text of the edit, or elsewhere ?--Pjacquot (talk) 16:55, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- If you need somebody having said the same thing as me, I regret, what I said was only my personal feeling having read the lyrics. One of Lather's former friends had his chair at the bank, and an other one was "commanding his very own tank". And sorry once more, he didn't command a battalion --Pjacquot (talk) 17:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Pjacquot, important changes you make with link in ref-tag, little changes you enter the link in the comment field. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Blind revert on "The Rockford Files"
You inappropriately reverted my removal of un-cited content on The Rockford Files. Please do not violate one of the five pillars of wikipedia WP:V again. 2601:281:8900:7A22:ACF3:F2BB:2A8C:46EB (talk) 18:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- I have accepted your revert, so your comment is superfluous. --Serols (talk) 18:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- No, it's clearly not superfluous as you are blindly reverting other edits far too fast to seriously consider their merits, how many times have you violated policy and just not gotten caught because you do it to people who don't know how to use wikipedia? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Serols#look_at_the_edit_before_you_undo 2601:281:8900:7A22:ACF3:F2BB:2A8C:46EB (talk) 18:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- What do you want from me? If you read the comment, you would have noticed, that he tried to insert a wrong name at the wrong place. I think your note and your comments are harassment. --Serols (talk) 09:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- No, it's clearly not superfluous as you are blindly reverting other edits far too fast to seriously consider their merits, how many times have you violated policy and just not gotten caught because you do it to people who don't know how to use wikipedia? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Serols#look_at_the_edit_before_you_undo 2601:281:8900:7A22:ACF3:F2BB:2A8C:46EB (talk) 18:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Manfred von Richthofen
sorry, i thought i was on wiki sandbox,how do i stay on wiki sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.73.48.154 (talk) 19:34, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Dear Serols, Please Stop Removing Content!!!!
Dear Serols, Please Stop Removing Content as you have no authority in Wiki Cyber-land. I have EVERY right to post work that i have done in the area listed to help promote awareness to new viewers as well as inform them of where the selected content came from. Therefore, as my intent is solely to inform and help to stimulate the sight of the reader, my actions are not to be considered as vandalism and i would kindly ask you to back the **** off and leave my postings and content alone! Instead, please enjoy and support the MANY artist of the district! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roneyfango90 (talk • contribs) 08:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- I believe you stop, because you are blocked with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Using Wikipedia for spam purposes). --Serols (talk) 13:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Ror
Unproven claims cannot be put down there. If they can be put down there , serols why delete the previous material on subject from book claiming different theories bit unfare don't u think. So .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoonya009 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Shoonya009, please use references and do not enter wrong names. --Serols (talk) 10:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Just asking....
Why was my edit at Arunachal Pradesh reverted ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.215.115.201 (talk) 17:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello 31.215.115.201, edits like this look like vandalism. --Serols (talk) 11:39, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, what was actually the vandalism there-the space or Hindi script. I am new, I need some help.31.215.115.201 (talk) 17:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello 31.215.115.201, this article answered a lot of questions. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, what was actually the vandalism there-the space or Hindi script. I am new, I need some help.31.215.115.201 (talk) 17:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
no vandalism
Hi, I am adding a reference to the article LATI (airline) but it seems your BOT is continuously erasing it. Can you fix it, please? Thanks. John — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.196.90.41 (talk) 16:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello 50.196.90.41, please read Wikipedia:External links - no blogs. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
PRODs
Hi, please don't restore PROD tags even if they have been removed by the creator or an IP editor like you did here [1]. PRODs can be removed by anyone, and reverting it with Huggle really isn't appropriate. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:08, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- I see the revert about the file. Got it, just please be careful about restoring PRODs. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello TonyBallioni, the Ip has deleted more than just the PROD tag, you should have seen this. --Serols (talk) 18:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
The Sockpuppets of UnderArmourKid
Hi, nice to meet you, I have 2 questions, 1. Was SuperTailsX a sockpuppet of UnderArmourKid? and 2. What should we do to avoid any sockpuppet of UnderArmourKid from appearing? Abdullah Almarri - A.W.S.T. (talk) 14:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Why was it removed?
Hey I added a line about what she said in FOX news today, that she loves the website 4chan very much. Why was my edit reverted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.218.131.107 (talk) 08:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello 103.218.131.107, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a tabloid. --Serols (talk) 08:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Zhou Youguang
Serols, my edit with Zhou Youguang is correct, and I have sources to confirm. There's people below that suggest that your undos are not great. Please correct this immediately, if you need something changed from it, I can do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.174.182.89 (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello 206.174.182.89, please mention this reference in the article. --Serols (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Note
Hi, I am monitoring the Breslov pages and notice that you gave a warning to User:Ronkruon here. Just wanted to note that he is now editing (and continuing to add Na Nach citations) under the new name User:Ronkruon1. Yoninah (talk) 23:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Yoninah, thank you for the information. What do you think, is his site a candidate for the blacklist? Regards --Serols (talk) 07:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, I recently added some important information the the breslov pages, with links to the site nanachnation which is a legit site with accurate information on this subject. My information was deleted and reported by "Yonina". If i should be doing this in a different way please let me know so that the information i add will stick. These topics are important to me and ones i study in depth. I cannot imagine why the information and links would be deleted. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronkruon1 (talk • contribs) 11:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Serols: It looks like this user is a new editor and is unfamiliar with Wikipedia policies as well as WP:SOCK. I have responded to his query on his talk page, and hope that he will read the rules and begin editing accordingly. If not, I'll get back to you. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 00:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, I recently added some important information the the breslov pages, with links to the site nanachnation which is a legit site with accurate information on this subject. My information was deleted and reported by "Yonina". If i should be doing this in a different way please let me know so that the information i add will stick. These topics are important to me and ones i study in depth. I cannot imagine why the information and links would be deleted. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronkruon1 (talk • contribs) 11:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Hm...
188.141.7.213 (talk · contribs) has ignored (or not seen) my messages on their talk page and continues to independently edit the article despite the comments at the top of the page. --JustBerry (talk) 15:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello JustBerry, if someone is not responding send a warning. --Serols (talk) 16:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- I realize. I was just giving you some context, as I saw your revert here. --JustBerry (talk) 17:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)