User talk:Seyit12

July 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Bbb23 (talk) 02:20, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Seyit12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I have read the terms of use, but I have not acted on behalf of anyone in return for a beneficial compensation. I'm just trying to source content on the wiki to render correctly. I am writing the articles of people who have news in media organizations. Other than that, I don't have any relationship. Himself thanked me on LinkedIn when he saw my writing. This was not something that I requested. Bbb23

And if you unblock me, I will do my best for originality and notability.~~~~

Decline reason:

I don't think you are picking these topics at random from the news. Perhaps if you were willing to abandon editing about living people and existing companies, an unblock could be considered, but not as I see it now. As such, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2021 Issues

hi, sorry for accidentally breaking the previous rules, i won't do anything like this again. My goal was not to introduce, but to practice how to write. I couldn't find another topic because there are so many topics. Can you please unblock. If I happen again, I agree that my membership will be deleted. Bbb23, 331dot Seyit12 (talk) 09:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts cannot be deleted, for technical and legal reasons. You may make another unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Seyit12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, sorry for accidentally breaking the previous rules, i won't do anything like this again. My goal was not to introduce, but to practice how to write. I couldn't find another topic because there are so many topics. Can you please unblock. If I happen again, I agree that my membership will be deleted. Seyit12 (talk) 11:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You already know accounts cannot be deleted, so this is a nonsense request. Additionally, you haven't pointed out which rules you've broken and therefore haven't convinced me you'd refrain from breaking them in the future. A voluntary topic ban on writing about living people and existing companies would go a long way to convincing the next reviewing admin that you would refrain from any undisclosed paid editing. Yamla (talk) 12:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to modify (or remove) declined unblock requests for your currently active block, as you did here. You are welcome to make a new unblock request. WP:GAB explains how; your attempt didn't work, as you claimed the new unblock request had already been reviewed. --Yamla (talk) 12:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confession. I'm sorry. I love to write. Please.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Seyit12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I've been banned for writing promotional articles. Actually, I accept this, but I have not received any monetary gain. It was only reported to me through advice, so I wrote it. I admit my guilt. After a long time, I will write a request again. I want to write an article in English. But this time I want to write with my own research. Thank you so much. Seyit12 (talk) 13:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Enlightment

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Seyit12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I have been a wikipedia user for almost 10 years and I started to write with a promotional mouth. This bothered me, actually, my job was to provide the most useful information to society. But since I'm writing with this just for the sake of writing, this has done some more damage to Wikipedia's authority and relevance. I realized my mistake and did some research. As a 10-year user, I decided that I needed to be more careful and a social beneficiary. You don't need to unblock anymore. I devoted myself to writing my own encyclopedia and building a community. I just wanted to inform you about the process. Good work. Seyit12 (talk) 09:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I note that you are no longer asking for an unblock. PhilKnight (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PhilKnight, Since I am uncomfortable with Turkish Wikipedians, I want my global user name to change or my page to disappear, that is, I want to be unblocked in order to use right to vanish. Can you apply? Thanks. Seyit12 (talk) 14:49, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am not going to unblock you. PhilKnight (talk) 15:37, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PhilKnight I have requested a global lock for this account, but this user has requested here for his enwiki user page to be deleted, because of the personal information on it (clarified this off-wiki). I don't know if that's something you may do? Or at least replace content with the {{Retired}} template and RevDel older revisions. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 16:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know - I have deleted the user page. PhilKnight (talk) 17:07, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]