User talk:ShanaHerrin

Welcome

Kudos for reading up on the policies. We're always glad of any help in improving our articles, so any verifiable information you have that's not in the article and you think is worth including, please do suggest it on the talk page. We have a template, {{requested edit}} for people with a conflict of interest (which you'll often see abbreviated to "COI"). Just put the template above your message on the talk page and hopefully someone will be along to make the edit. You're not forbidden from editing the article yourself, as long as you declare your COI (as you have done, which is great) and abide by our policies, particularly the one on adhering to a neutral point of view. If you need a hand with anything, just drop by my talk page and I'll see what I can do. I've confirmed your account, so you can edit the talk page itself instead of a subpage. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:07, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I second the above; welcome and Kudos! My talkpage is also open =) Nik thestoned 09:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ShanaHerrin, please accept my apologies for my knee-jerk first reaction to your edit. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:36, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GFE of 11 June 2012

Hello. I noticed your edit of 11 June 2012 that removed a statement that seemed to be supported by the referenced source. I know that you are a "good faith" editor, but I don't understand what motivated your edit. Could you please explain? Also, in the future, I suggest to provide an edit summary to help people understand the motivation for your edits. (Please see Help:Edit summary.) —BarrelProof (talk) 20:29, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]