User talk:Shoessss/Archive Jun 2007

LIBELOUS Content - Richard Walter site

Bturvey is adding LIBELOUS information to the biography page of Richard Walter

Mr. Turvey is upset because Mr. Walter had blocked his admission to the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. To try to get even, Mr. Turvey has created libelous websites and is attempting to vandalize his wikipedia page.

I strongly suggest that the page be LOCKED at the point before Bturvey's vandalism.

To accuse someone of "perjury" and "fraud" is libel.

Please contact me so that we can settle this dispute.

Thank you very much,

User: Buzzle45

Â· ShoesssS ^Talk21:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dunboyne

Thanks for removing the vandalism on Dunboyne. It really pisses me off when people vandalise one of the pages I take a great deal of interest in, and work hard to improve it. -- TheChrisD â¢ 11:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Sorry to say; âWelcome to Wikipediaâ!. â¢ ShoesssS ^Talk

Sorry to say? -- TheChrisD â¢ 15:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, I meant the vandalism. â¢ ShoesssS ^Talk

Re:And Again Thanks!

My pleasure. I seem to have incurred its wrath now! ... discospinster _talk 12:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, well the good news. They are now blocked. â¢ ShoesssS ^Talk

I'm confused as to what happened to the dialogue...you expressed your concerns of the significance of my article and while I asked for just a bit more time to complete it with all the necessary links and spend the last 3 hours compiling stuff for a whole new article on this new era of artist representation on the internet, you go and delete eveything i have and then there's not even a record of any of the dialogue that took place. I am bewildered because of what I am trying to talk about of this new generation of musicians is based on all the same principles that wikipedia has been founded...i am bewildered and a bit pissed off that there's not even a little bit more warning...unless I am completely missing something, please explain it to me a bit further

Hey User: Sluggie17, as I stated on the articleâs discussion page you created, I believe you have a great idea/concept for an article with regards to the overall genre as it relates to the internet with regards to musicians. However, once again, I believe you should write the article in terms of the genre rather than using an individual who has not gained overall notability to be included in Wikipedia. If you want help in developing the article in an overall sense, I am more than happy to give a hand and or advice. In addition, I was not the one to delete the article; the deletion log can be found here, [1]. Hope this answers you questions. Once again, any help you need just ask. â¢ ShoesssS ^Talk 22:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Th Bill Caplian

thanks for putting the speedy delete tag on that page, i couldn't manage it cos those two editors kept causing edit conflicts with me --Jac16888 15:52, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. By the way, how's it going in that heated debate? I see it's still continuing. --Tone 13:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tone, welcome backâ¦.Hope everything came out OK. No problem with regards to the revert. It was my pleasure. Ahhâ¦the debate is going to be the end of me. LOL. I take it one day at a time, than go home and kick the dog :-). Nice hearing from you again, and by the wayâ¦have a great day. â¢ ShoesssS ^Talk

pfffffftttt!

You think your vandal proof will stop a troll? you just made yourself a new friend fag.

I always found it more satisfying to make constructive contributions to articles rather than just vandalizing the work of others. But than again, I have more than two brain cells in my head. â¢ ShoesssS ^Talk

Sorry. You're gonna have to provide independent verification of THAT.Simplemines 05:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

{{helpme}} I am embarrassed to ask this for the amount of time I have been here! But how do you link an uploaded photo to an article. I canât seem to find any instructions on how to establish the link. Thanks. ShoesssS ^Talk

What image is it first of all? Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 16:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick responce, but I am hoping I figured it out. Is the correct format? Once again, thanks for the help.

Use this format like you did above:

[[Image:Hopkins-Nanjing Center.jpg|thumb|right|Hopkins-Nanjing Center]] turns out like:

File:Hopkins-Nanjing Center.jpg

Hopkins-Nanjing Center

PS. dont forget the image format like .jpg or .png!

Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 16:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) I do appreciate the help. Have a great day. â¢ ShoesssS ^Talk 17:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, if you have anymore problems with images, just see: Wikipedia:Images. Best Regards Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 17:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kuna Yala

Hello.

If you think the edits are unconstructive, you are wrong.

I am Panamanian and have been there several times and know the history, facts, etc better than you.

I will make the changes back.

If you don't believe me, contact a native Kuna and you will see they are correct.

I am sorry User:200.90.143.2, but your edits are extremely “Point of View”. In addition, you have not cited any reference or reliable sources stating the allegations you have made. If you can provide this material, I am more than happy to concur with you and include the information. However, without, I am sorry, it does not belong in the article. If you need any help in structuring the information in a more palatable manner, please let me know and I would be more than happy in giving you a hand. Hope this helps. ShoesssS ^Talk 00:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)~[reply]