User talk:SimoMartorana
SimoMartorana, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi SimoMartorana! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC) |
Feedback on User:SimoMartorana/sandbox
[edit]Hi SimoMartorana, good work putting together this page. You do a good job of explaining Fabre Serris' importance right at the start of the article. It might be worth bulking up the section before the table of contents just a little, to further bolster Fabre Serris' notability. In a UK context, professorships indicate someone is a leading authority in their field – and that seems to be the case in France – but to American readers that might not be as clear since the title is used in a different way and much more often. I've adjusted some of the links in the article
- Is it possible to include a reference for Fabre Serris' date of birth? As stuff in infoboxes is easier for computers to read, that stuff can get shared around very quickly so it's handy for the reader to be able to see where the info comes from originally.
- Would it be worth mentioning her PhD supervisor in the text? On a related note, has Fabre Serris supervised any PhD students?
- Good job mentioning the journals Fabre Serris has co-edited. I think it would be useful to give a little more detail on the journals, such as what topics do they cover. It doesn't need to be much, just enough to give an idea of what kind of stuff they publish.
- I'm not sure what 'Savoirs et systèmes de pensée' is, so a bit of context would help me at least!
- In the last few years, Fabre Serris has focused more... Is it possible to hone this down a little, say to a decade? Text like 'recently' or 'last few years' tends to date unless the article gets updated.
- At the moment the references are bare links which work now but if websites ever get re-arranged they'll stop working. Editors like to include a bit of extra information, like when they were accessed, to help in the future in case the links go dead. If you're using the Visual Editor (works like a Google Doc) rather than the source code editor (where you see all the characters that are used to format the page) then converting the references from bare weblinks is pretty straightforward. Have you used the Visual Editor yet?
This is an impressive effort and is ready to be moved into the main part of the encycloedia when you want. Richard Nevell (talk) 12:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)