User talk:Simonuspc
Simonuspc, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Simonuspc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC) |
Quebec Deaths
[edit]I'm happy to move it into text format for now until we see how deaths are reported. I would like to keep the information handy in case in the future we get the data presented in such a manner.
Therefore, as a compromise I'll do just that, and we can re-evaluate in a few days to see if it should enter a table or not. --Gau Choob (talk) 16:37, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
How is it that we have a negative death? Zombies? :p -- RemainingAnonymous, 13:30, 23 March 2020 (EST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.203.117.87 (talk)
From
2 : Le nombre de décès lié au COVID-19 est inférieur à celui annoncé le 21 mars 2020. Le test de l’une de ces personnes s’est montré négatif. Simonuspc (talk) 17:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Severity in chart
[edit]Recovered + Dead + Mild + Serious should equal the total I think.
So should subtract dead and recovered from the mild category? --Gau Choob (talk) 05:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
What's the source for the serious and mild cases? What I am saying is, if the person is dead, they are not considered a mild or serious case. If the person is recovered, they are not considered a mild or serious case. So for example, for Mar 19, I think 112 mild cases makes more sense than 114 --Gau Choob (talk) 18:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Sure we can delete the deaths row
[edit]Feel free to go ahead and do that if you agree with me. --Gau Choob (talk) 18:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Hospitalized = ?ICU
[edit]I'm actually not sure either, sorry.
March 21 Legault says 10 hospitalized (une augmentation de neuf) and 10 in ICU (+4) http://www.assnat.qc.ca/fr/actualites-salle-presse/conferences-points-presse/ConferencePointPresse-58345.html
Sounds like it's separate but not 100% sure
--Gau Choob (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Cases change
[edit]They say the number 14 yesterday was a typo and the number was actually 41.
1. L’augmentation observée pour la région de Chaudière-Appalaches n’est pas une réelle augmentation du nombre de cas en 24 heures, mais plutôt attribuable à une erreur de transmission de la donnée en date du 24 mars (le nombre était plutôt de 41 et non 14)
--Gau Choob (talk) 05:05, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Makes sense! I had not noticed that! Simonuspc (talk) 11:53, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Gonna remove your .svg
[edit]Please put them back if you update them, but right now they are out of date.
Cheers --Gau Choob (talk) 19:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)