User talk:SimpleDecisions

Your submission at Articles for creation: Late Model Restoration (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Late Model Restoration and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 11:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

SimpleDecisions (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I rightfully changed my name from the "spam" Materialscientist suggested I had done. It was an honest mistake, but I would like to have the block removed so I may submit the article I was looking to create or go about having it created so that it is not a one sided article. If possible, could one of the admins reach out to me or point me in the right direction to go about doing so? Much appreciated

Accept reason:

Name changed and user intends to edit in accordance with policy going forward. -- Avi (talk) 15:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm not going to review this, but I do note that your username looks like a real person's name. This may be a violation of the username policy as well unless you can prove you are this person. PhilKnight (talk) 12:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: How exactly would I go about proving that? Why would they approve my username change if this is a violation? Should I change it again just to be safe?

~~Maybe it's not a true violation - I didn't rename you, so I really don't know. In any circumstance, I'm leaving this to someone else for review. PhilKnight (talk) 12:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

Comment: Oh I understand. How long do these reviews typically take? Honestly, at this point, I would just like to try and have a non-biased article created on a particular topic, but I can't go about doing this with a block. I've changed my name, and submitted that I am looking to appeal the block and stated that this was a misunderstanding on my part, But I don't understand how exactly to fix this? Thanks in advance for any help.

~~I've put the request on hold pending comment from the blocking admin - @Materialscientist: PhilKnight (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

Thank you so much, this is very much appreciated. Will I receive any feedback on where exactly this goes? Also, just to be preventative on future happenings, I'm going to put in a request to change my username.

Just for informational purposes, it seems your suggestion was in good faith. Changing Username

Done Please review the appropriate policies, especially as relate notability and conflict of interest. Welcome to Wikipedia! -- Avi (talk) 15:41, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have struck some comments above which have fake signatures, made by someone who has been blocked for impersonating an admin. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow! Thanks! I had no idea! Boy, I feel silly now. SimpleDecisions 16:55, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Late Model Restoration

Hello, SimpleDecisions. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Late Model Restoration".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 17:28, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Thank you for the heads up! I have submitted this article to be created under the requested articles for business, but it seems not to be considered credible enough for an article creation, having to do something with it being a company, organization, or corporation. If this is the case, why is there articles on similar site such as AmericanMuscle and CJ Pony Parts? I guess I don't understand how to go about creating an article on this or getting one created. I don't necessarily want to create the article myself, but would like to have one created on this topic. Would you be able to tell me if I've taken the correct steps possible to have one created?