Jump to content

User talk:Sir Doc MD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Andre🚐 12:54, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

–MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you haven't done anything wrong, but I figured you should be aware of the extra rules for this topic area. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Routine alert for the Covid-19 topic area, fringe science and climate change[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 08:41, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 08:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe promotion[edit]

Please stop using Wikipedia as a platform to push election denialism or other kook claims. It's inappropriate. Neutralitytalk 14:54, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality, if you want to be unecyclopedic, Wikipedia isn't the place for you. Sir Doc MD (talk) 01:21, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality has been on Wikipedia since 2004, which is almost as long as me. And he became an admin only a few months before I did, though much longer than I now at this point. He is 100% correct, and you need to stop pushing election denialism. Andre🚐 02:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And here's another Admin telling you the same thing. EG[1]. I've only been around for 16 years and an Admin for 14. One more strike and you're out. That includes personal (and ridiculous) attacks such as the one above. Doug Weller talk 11:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The fake authoritative language is hilarious. "Wikipedia isn't the place for you" isn't a personal attack. I'm afraid as admins, your appeal to authority fallacies are disappointing. It doesn't matter how long you've been an admin, Wikipedia is still meant to be encyclopedic. An encyclopedia states that, "Donald Trump claimed Joe Biden stole the election," with a criticism section lower down. An encyclopedia does not state that "Donald Trump falsely said X." Especially when there is evidence that he believes to be proof of fraud, it is not factual nor encyclopedic to claim that "Donald Trump baselessly did Y." You want to challenge his bases? Go ahead. Sir Doc MD (talk) 18:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry that's not how it works. We go by what reliable sources say. Which agree that due to 60+ failed lawsuits and repeated audits in many states, Trump's claims were and are baseless. Andre🚐 18:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Only a few of Trump's lawsuits were brought to trial, and he won a majority of them. Most of the trials didn't even go to court, with the judges asking "What are they supposed to do, overturn a federal election?" They didn't have the power to overturn the election, but that doesn't mean Donald's claims of fraud aren't true.
Reliable media? There is an entire debate about that too. That is why encyclopedias are supposed to be encyclopedic. Let me guess, the FBI is reliable too? Read the COINTELPRO article on this very website.
The media and elite institutions, by any rational reasoning, are most definitely not the benevolent truth-sayers some claim them to be. However, again, an encyclopedia is not meant to debate that. And, again, that's why encyclopedias are meant to be encyclopedic. Sir Doc MD (talk) 02:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
These conspiracy theories aren't welcome here. Keep this up, and you will likely find your account blocked.[02:17, 30 August 2022 (UTC)]
"In more than 60 cases, judges “looked at the allegations that Trump was making and determined they were without any merit.” [2] "Independent experts, governors and state election officials from both parties say there was no evidence of widespread fraud." [3] Andre🚐 02:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How much do you get paid as a Wikipedia admin? Sir Doc MD (talk) 20:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not an admin, just a former admin, and I am not paid for anything I do here. None of the admins are paid as far as I know, maybe some people have received some grants or T-shirt from time to time, but the vast majority of everyone is a volunteer. Andre🚐 20:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ah damn btw cointelpro isnt a conspiracy theres literally an article about it on this very website Sir Doc MD (talk) 18:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm familiar with COINTELPRO, what's your point? Andre🚐 18:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

The next time you disrupt an article with tendentious editing in defiance of reliable sources, you will be blocked. For reliable sources, please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources. Bishonen | tålk 20:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Please dont omgggg i dont wanna have to create a new accoutn omg its so fifficult Sir Doc MD (talk) 18:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that's interesting. What was your first account, please? How many accounts have you had blocked? Bishonen | tålk 19:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 19:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
oh my word, no! im going to have to *shutter* create a new account! whatever will i do??? How much pain and suffering have you bestowed upon me!!! Sir Doc MD (talk) 16:15, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sir_Doc_MD&oldid=1108292313"