Jump to content

User talk:Sirvinlex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2023

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 15:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies:Sirvinlex (talk) 20:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Good day Drmies, I received your notification of my account be being blocked. I am new to Wikipedia, I read through the policies attached to the block message, I am planning to appeal the block and hence will like to know if there is any additional clarifications you will want to share with me concerning my situation before I make the appeal. Thanks. Sirvinlex (talk) 20:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi--well, I don't think you're new here, and you were a technical match with a whole bunch of other accounts churning out promotional edits. That's about as much as I can share. Drmies (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sirvinlex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good day, I am writing to appeal my blocked account. Based on the feedback I got from the admin that blocked the account, the article draft I created was not structured in accordance with the Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Aside that I might have made some edits that might have been disruptive. I want to say that it was not deliberate from my end and I take responsibility for my actions because I should have gotten myself familiar with Wikipedia best practices before trying to publish an article. I want to say that I have learnt my lessons and will desist from creating any new article for the time being. I am new to Wikipedia, and the reason I joined is to help make improvements here. I will just continue with simple edits as I continue to learn and Improve. Thanks Sirvinlex (talk) 20:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't speak to the paid editing and your association with other accounts, which is checkuser confirmed(I'm not one). You'll need to speak to these things for any chance- as slim as it is- at being unblocked. 331dot (talk) 20:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note from ArbCom

[edit]

This user was directed to appeal to ArbCom about 10 hours before our motion changing the procedures passed. After discussion we've directed this user to appeal their unblock on UTRS/onwiki. Noting this publicly so that such an appeal is not held against them given the discussion above. For the arbitration committee, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

good day, please can you point me to guild on how to do the UTRS/onwiki appeal. Thanks Sirvinlex (talk) 19:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
never mind, I seen the link https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/ Sirvinlex (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:African China (musician)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:African China (musician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 20:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback, I think it was a bit early for me to publish an article since I am new and have not fully understood the process of writing new article. I am going to appeal the block and in the meantime desist from writing new article, and only do simple edits till I become more familiar with Wikipedia. @Drmies: Sirvinlex (talk) 07:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sirvinlex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good day, in reply to my initial block appeal that was declined, about my account been associated with other accounts and me doing paid editing. I don't know how and why CheckUser think my account is associated with some other account, that not true, I don't know anything about that, what I can say about it is that I am usually logged in with my Phone and laptop at thesame time and usually edit through any of them. Also I usually edit at my house and at my work place. So, if it's possible for the CheckUser result to be reviewed by an admin, I plead that it should be checked because my account isn't associated with any other other account. In regards to me doing paid editing, I want to say that it's not also true, I am not doing paid editing, please I will like to request that my edit history be checked with regards to this. Thanks Sirvinlex (talk) 09:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The page you created was grossly promotional and not appropriate, paid or not. MER-C 04:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sirvinlex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good day, yes the page I was trying to create did not meet the Wikipedia standard for writing article, and I have admitted that in my first appeal, it was to quick for me to publish an article when I have not gotten acquainted with Wikipedia best practices for writing articles. And I apologized and promised not to write any new article till I have improved my learning in the Wikipedia ecosystem. But one of the admin said that my account was linked to other accounts according to checkUser. But this is not true as I emphasized on my second appeal. I requested that the checkUser result be reviewed by an admin but did not get reply until recently Sirvinlex (talk) 09:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm believing the technical evidence from Checkuser here, per Drmies comment above. Declined as a sockpuppet who makes promotional-style edits in line with other socks caught on the same IP's. Daniel (talk) 08:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sirvinlex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good day, I'm very sorry to insist, but I don't want a Checkuser technical error to prevent me from being part of Wikipedia. Just like I mentioned in my previous appeal, I´ll forget about "African China (musician)", and will refrain from writing and publishing new articles until I learn more. All I ask is that someone recheck Checkuser´s assumption, because it is wrong. No one is using my IP address but me. I have never had any Wikipedia account, this is my first and only account. Therefore checkuser is making a mistake. All I ask is that someone check it, please. I want to be part of Wikipedia community. Sirvinlex (talk) 19:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As this has hone stale and is a checkuser block, you may email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org with your username and appeal. Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sirvinlex&oldid=1211995629"