User talk:Snarke

Regarding you edits to Beta

Hi, thanks for the edits to Beta (Magic: The Gathering). While I found them enlightening, it would be great if you had anything to back them up with as especially the "could afford to pay for the rest of the print run" part might be challenged. I know it is unlikely as this is not the kind of information that companies distribute freely, but if you could point to anything, that would be awesome.

Besides that you changed the print run to 7.8 million instead of 7.3 m. As production manager I assume that you should know, but Wizards states the print run to be 7.3 m on the set's website. The officialy MTG encyclopedia gives it as 7.3, too. On the other hand Crystal Keep says the print run was 7.8 m. As far as I can tell these are the most authoritative sources. If you could point to something, that makes it clear, that 7.8 m is indeed correct, it would be a great help, too.

Cheers, OdinFK (talk) 12:49, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I could provide more solid references. Most of the changes are based on my memory of conversations I had with other Wizards of the Coast staff at the time. I'm almost positive that the total print run was 10.4 million, and that Alpha was supposed to be 25% of the total. I'm assuming the "7.3" is because somebody, at some point, rounded the print run to 10 million, and somebody else, not realizing that the "10 million" number was imprecise, subtracted the Alpha print run and came to the conclusion that Beta must have been 7.3. But I don't know for sure.

Ensoniq SDP-1 Sampled Digital Piano moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ensoniq SDP-1 Sampled Digital Piano, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 08:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving the SDP-1 article to draftspace makes sense. However, I haven't been able to figure out what criteria the article needs to meet to qualify it for being published. There are two fairly vague reviews of this object online, but neither of them have anything particularly quotable or provide much factual data about the instrument. I'm pretty sure I can pull my owner's manual out of storage, but I cannot figure out if that's adequately "verifiable," since you'd have to visit me to see the manual yourself. Snarke (talk) 08:53, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ensoniq SDP-1 Sampled Digital Piano (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources, not just a single source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ensoniq SDP-1 Sampled Digital Piano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:56, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Snarke! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:56, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ensoniq SDP-1 Sampled Digital Piano

Hello, Snarke. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ensoniq SDP-1 Sampled Digital Piano, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ensoniq SDP-1 Sampled Digital Piano

Hello, Snarke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ensoniq SDP-1 Sampled Digital Piano".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ensoniq SDP-1 Sampled Digital Piano has been accepted

Ensoniq SDP-1 Sampled Digital Piano, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 13:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]