User talk:SnollygosterIlleism49

Commas in dates

Hey there, before you waste any more of your time, Wikipedia's in-house manual of style (MOS) for dates and years, in use in all our articles, states that there should be no comma between the month and year for day-month-year (DMY) dates. I've undone (reversed) those edits. Happy editing, IgnorantArmies 17:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(The following is a generic welcome message:)

Welcome!

Hello, SnollygosterIlleism49, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! IgnorantArmies 18:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Date formats

Hello, and thank you for trying to improve Wikipedia. I came to tell you that you're wasting your time adding commas in day-first format dates, because we have a house style that doesn't include them: see MOS:DATEFORMAT. But I see someone already has. Please don't ignore this advice, or people will start thinking you're trying to be disruptive. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 22:53, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Your recent editing history at The Pirate Bay shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Avono (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like another attempt to spam a cheap copy of the TPB website, and may well be a WP:SOCK.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 19:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My guess as well. All his previous edits were sneaky vandalism. Avono (talk) 19:15, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Pirate Bay because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:17, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]