User talk:Somepiggy
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Somepiggy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Time of Troubles. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack T. Conway has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sulfurboy (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)You're invited to Afripedia
[edit]Hello Somepiggy.
You are invited to Wikiafripedia to help improve your article on "Beryl Bernay", replaced the ads on it with yours if you have an advertising account, tell people about it and start earning.
Good luck
PS.
Be bold Afripedians will be there to help out.
Useful link:
- Wikiafripedia:Core content policies
- Wikiafripedia:Encouraging Afripedians — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.112.57.159 (talk) 15:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Anton Bilton for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anton Bilton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Bilton (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 21:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Fosun RZ Capital for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fosun RZ Capital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fosun RZ Capital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 07:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
[edit]Hello Somepiggy. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Fosun RZ Capital, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Somepiggy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Somepiggy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creepTalk 20:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)