User talk:Special rapid

Please write order in special rapid freely.

no title

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as To LOVEru) are not in an acceptable level of English. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Steve _(Stephen)^talk 09:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for comment. However, there is the part which can lack because I do it while I use translation of Yahoo! in what do not understand English with a Japanese well.

Excuse me, but please understand it.

Special rapid 09:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)(ja)[reply]

To LOVEru

Hi, I deleted (removed) To LOVEru because it made no sense in English, and it would not be possible for us to fix it to make sense. I think you should not make big changes and big edits until you understand English better. Maybe you could ask people on the Japanese Wikipedia to help you with translations? --Wafulz 15:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jal-boing767 sakitoku.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Jal-boing767 sakitoku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--N.C 13:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

commons:user talk:special rapid-from:japanより移動済

special rapid(ja/commons) 04:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing your revision on Tower Records

Sorry I didn't explain to you earlier why I undid your revision of adding a photo. The reason was that simply it didn't make sense adding another photo of Japan when there was already one photo of Shibuya store. I will write more in your Japanese page. --Sumori 13:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ja:user talk:special rapid I am similar and am finished with confirmation

special rapid(ja/commons) 08:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

e-radio proposed for deletion

E-radio

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article E-radio, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tualha (Talk) 07:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

これ以上

恥を晒さないでくれ。日本語版でブロックされているのはWikipediaの方針を理解していないせいなのだ。それは他国語版では理解できるという性質のものではない。自分がWikipediaに対して貢献していないこと、日本語版で君に寄せられている批判を重く受け止めて、行動を自重してくれ。 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.117.41.64 (talk) 02:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above user of IP61.117.41.64. You are blocked from Japanese Wikipedia because you do not understand jawp's policy at all. Consider what you have done to jawp and understand its policy well, or you will not be able to contribute to it, let alone to projects in other languages. PLEASE stop coming to enwp just for block evasion. Yassie 03:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user, ja:User:Special_rapid, has been blocked indefinitely from ja:Wikipedia since 10 October 2007. For further information, please see RfB page in jawp. --Kurihaya 09:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop creating nonsense redirect

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Stop creating Japanese -> English redirect. There's no need for such redirects in ENGLISH Wikipedia. Or, you'll be blocked from enwp too. Yassie 11:45, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weekly Jump Cover0744.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weekly Jump Cover0744.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sket Dance

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sket Dance, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unnotable manga series. Fails WP:BK

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sket Dance

I have nominated Sket Dance, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sket Dance. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of School of Lock!

The article School of Lock! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to warrant its own article, so perhaps deletion or merging into Tokyo FM would be appropriate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EuroPride (talk) 17:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]