User talk:SpongySB

Welcome!

Hello, SpongySB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. DanielRigal (talk) 13:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chef (South Park) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chef (South Park) was changed by SpongySB (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2017-07-10T02:55:01+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that repeatedly triggered the edit filter. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpongySB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I'm so sorry; I didn't know my edit was vandlism. I just figured it was the actual name considering how many times the name "McShittles" has been put on the article. Please let me back on. I sincerely apologize and promise to be more contributory once I come back.

Decline reason:

You genuinely thought McGriddles were called McShittles? And you expect us to believe that? Especially after you tried to write elsewhere that "Once McGriddles gets unlocked Im gonna vandalize it with explicit and replace it with "McShittles"? And you thought Bob's Burgers was called Boobs B-itches? I've revoked your ability to edit this talk page. I think the best you're going to get now is the WP:Standard Offer, so go away and do at least six months of growing up and then ask at WP:UTRS to have your ability to make a new unblock request restored. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.